The Sentinel-Record

NATION: Trump pick for intel director withdraws

- MARY CLARE JALONICK JONATHAN LEMIRE

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s pick for national intelligen­ce director, Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe, withdrew from considerat­ion Friday after just five days as he faced growing questions about his experience and qualificat­ions.

The move underscore­d the uncertaint­y over his confirmati­on prospects. Democrats openly dismissed the Republican congressma­n as an unqualifie­d partisan and Republican­s offered only lukewarm and tentative expression­s of support.

The announceme­nt leaves the intelligen­ce community without a permanent, Senate-confirmed leader at a time when the U.S. government is grappling with North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, the prospect of war with Iran and the anticipate­d efforts of Russia or other foreign government­s to interferen­ce in the American political system.

In a tweet Friday, Trump said Ratcliffe had decided to stay in Congress so as to avoid “months of slander and libel.”

Trump didn’t cite specific media reports, though multiple stories in the last week have questioned Ratcliffe’s qualificat­ions and suggested that he had misreprese­nted his experience as a federal prosecutor in Texas.

Ratcliffe is a frequent Trump defender who fiercely questioned former special counsel Robert Mueller during a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week.

Even as Mueller laid bare concerns that Russia was working to interfere with U.S. elections again, Ratcliffe remained focused on the possibilit­y that U.S. intelligen­ce agencies had overly relied on unverified opposition research in investigat­ing the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

In his own statement, Ratcliffe said he remained convinced that he could have done the job “with the objectivit­y, fairness and integrity that our intelligen­ce agencies need and deserve.”

“However,” he added, “I do not wish for a national security and intelligen­ce debate surroundin­g my confirmati­on, however untrue, to become a purely political and partisan issue.”

Ratcliffe would have replaced former intelligen­ce director Dan Coats, who repeatedly clashed with Trump and announced his resignatio­n a week ago.

The White House in recent days fielded a number of calls from Republican­s wary of Ratlciffe’s confirmati­on chances and uncomforta­ble with his qualificat­ions, according to two administra­tion officials not authorized to speak publicly about private conversati­ons.

Several news stories in recent days called into question aspects of Ratcliffe’s resume and career, alarming some in the GOP, while a few key Republican senators already greeted his nomination with a lukewarm response.

Taking their cue from the president’s instinct to push back against the media and fight for problemati­c nominees, White House officials initially planned to rally around the choice. But Ratcliffe himself expressed concern to the West Wing about the scrutiny, the administra­tion officials said.

They said that though the president long admired Ratcliffe’s interviews in which he defended the White House, as well as his performanc­e in the Mueller hearings, Trump grew convinced that the nomination battle would become a distractio­n — and was quick, as he often is, to blame the media for treating his administra­tion unfairly.

The scuttled nomination deepened questions about the White House’s seemingly haphazard vetting process, but Trump brushed aside those concerns, even crediting the media for its role in the process.

“You vet for me. I like when you vet … I think the White House has a great vetting process. You vet for me,” Trump said. “When I give a name, I give it out to the press and you vet for me. A lot of times you do a very good job. Not always.”

North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, the chairman of the Senate intelligen­ce committee, said in a statement that he respects Ratcliffe’s decision and he is committed to moving the official nomination through committee. “There is no substitute for having a Senate-confirmed director in place to lead our Intelligen­ce Community,” Burr said.

Until then, lawmakers have privately and publicly urged Trump to put Sue Gordon, Coats’ No. 2, in charge once Coats steps down. But it’s unclear whether he will. Trump told reporters Friday that “certainly she will be considered” for the acting director position.

For Coats’ permanent replacemen­t, Trump told reporters that he has a list of three people he’s working on over the weekend, and “probably Monday I’ll give you an answer.”

After Trump announced that Ratcliffe was his pick, Senate Republican­s were publicly lukewarm on Ratcliffe’s nomination. Some expressed concerns that the House lawmaker, who was viewed as a partisan, did not come with the gravitas of Coats, who had longtime relations as a former senator. Some senators said they had never even heard of him before his questionin­g of Mueller.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell signaled a wait-andsee approach on Tuesday, saying only that he looked forward to meeting with Ratcliffe and discussing his background.

McConnell, R-Ky., said that “generally speaking, I’d lean toward the president’s nominees.” But he declined to fully endorse Ratcliffe, who served as a mayor of a small Texas town and a U.S. attorney before being elected to Congress in 2014.

Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, a Republican who is a former member of the intelligen­ce committee, appeared more concerned, saying that Ratcliffe will have “some catching up to do” in the role. He said Coats, who had spent decades in Washington, clearly had more experience.

“Is he qualified for that job?” Lankford asked, referring to Ratcliffe. “He’s a qualified, gifted individual, but I think it will take some time for him to do some on the job training to be able to get into it.”

Maine Sen. Susan Collins, a critical swing vote for the GOP who sits on the intelligen­ce panel, praised Coats and said the intelligen­ce position is very important to her because she co-wrote the legislatio­n that created it 15 years ago. She said she had never heard of Ratcliffe before last week, so she couldn’t comment on his qualificat­ions, but added that she wants “an independen­t, well-qualified individual in that post.”

Democrats strongly criticized Ratcliffe’s partisansh­ip, noting he was a vocal skeptic of former special counsel Mueller’s investigat­ion. They said he wasn’t suited for a position that is designed to objectivel­y oversee the nation’s intelligen­ce agencies.

Trump did little to assuage those concerns, saying of Ratcliffe on Tuesday: “I think we need somebody like that there. We need somebody strong that can really rein it in. Because, as I think you’ve all learned, the intelligen­ce agencies have run amok. They’ve run amok.”

Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligen­ce committee, said he wanted a nominee like Coats: “someone with a deep knowledge of the intelligen­ce community, respect for the hard work intelligen­ce profession­als do to keep us safe, and the independen­ce and integrity to speak truth to power when necessary.”

 ?? The Associated Press ?? CAPITOL HILL: Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas., questions former special counsel Robert Mueller as he testifies on July 24 before the House Intelligen­ce Committee hearing on his report on Russian election interferen­ce on Capitol Hill in Washington.
The Associated Press CAPITOL HILL: Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas., questions former special counsel Robert Mueller as he testifies on July 24 before the House Intelligen­ce Committee hearing on his report on Russian election interferen­ce on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States