The Sentinel-Record

Defend, not defund

- Dana D. Kelley is a freelance writer from Jonesboro. Dana Kelley Guest columnist

Among the social protest chants and phrases that come around from time to time, “defund the police” has set a new high for nonsense.

An appropriat­e counter is “defend the police,” and a great starting point goes back to 1970, when rising crime and city riots were challengin­g police and law enforcemen­t policies and practices.

That’s when broadcast legend Paul Harvey turned his microphone—featuring his familiar voice and cadence, signature pauses and inimitable intonation­s for emphasis—to the ordinary cop

(Harvey’s father was an Oklahoma police officer shot and killed while hunting off-duty by robbers).

In his “What is a Policeman?” commentary, he needed only three minutes to precisely distill the essence of the profession.

He began with universal humanity: like all of us, a policeman is “a mingling of saint and sinner, dust and deity”; and then confronted the outsized condemnati­ons of bad cops.

“Culled statistics wave the fan over the stinkers, underscore instances of dishonesty and brutality because they are ‘news,’” he said, quickly applying the logical extension. “What that really means is that they are exceptiona­l, they are unusual, they are not commonplac­e.”

He dug into the meat of the matter. “Buried under the froth is the fact,” he said, “and the fact is, less than one-half of 1 percent of policemen misfit that uniform.”

A moment’s hesitation to bring context to the percentage: “And that is a better average than you’d find among clergymen.”

As with any grouping of people, sensationa­lizing the misdeeds and crimes of a few to smear the whole is wrong. It’s also something Black Lives Matter supporters should recognize—and repudiate—more than most, since lawful Blacks have long suffered stereotypi­ng that stemmed from Black criminals in the news.

Harvey excelled in concisenes­s, and he rapidly coursed through the “no-win” scenarios that are part and parcel of police life in dealing with the fickle public masses.

“If the policeman is neat, he’s conceited; if he’s careless, he’s a bum. If he’s pleasant, he’s a flirt; if he’s not, he’s a grouch.

“He must make instant decisions which would require months for a lawyer. But,” he stopped, invoking an emphatic break, “if he hurries, he’s careless; If he’s deliberate, he’s lazy.”

Police interactio­ns, then and now, sometimes escalate to physical altercatio­ns.

“He must be able to whip two men twice his size and half his age without damaging his uniform and without being ‘brutal,’” Harvey said, waiting a beat. “If you hit him, he’s a coward; if he hits you, he’s a bully.”

Next, he adroitly condensed dual dynamics unique to law enforcemen­t officers into two succinct statements.

“A policeman must know everything,”—dramatic pause—“and not tell.”

“He must know where all the sin is,”—even longer pause—“and not partake.”

The science of forensics was in its infancy 50 years ago, but even then it elevated expectatio­ns.

“The policeman—from a single human hair!—must be able to describe the crime, the weapon, the criminal and tell you where the criminal is hiding. But,” Harvey let the radio silence speak for a moment, “if he catches the criminal, he’s lucky; if he doesn’t, he is a dunce. If he gets promoted, he has political pull; if he doesn’t, he’s a dullard.”

Paperwork was a pain for police all those generation­s ago, too, as Harvey noted, and plea-bargaining as a revolving-door practice was taking off to keep up with the increase in crimes and arrests.

“He runs files and writes reports until his eyes ache to build a case against some felon who’ll get dealed out by a shameless shamus or an ‘honorable’ who isn’t honorable.”

Concluding his commentary, Harvey listed the “must be” roles of a police officer as “a minister, a social worker, a diplomat, a tough guy, and a gentleman,” sounding out the final word as gen-tle-man.

“And of course he’ll have to be a genius,” Harvey finished, “because he’ll have to feed a family”—one last, lasting pause—“on a policeman’s salary.”

The average cop earns somewhere between $18 an hour (North Carolina) and $26 an hour (New York).

Arkansas is 43rd in police officer payscale at $20.51 per hour on average, which is within one penny of the 2020 Arkansas Occupation­al Employment and Wage Survey’s mean hourly wage for all occupation­s ($20.52).

But the danger risk for sworn law enforcemen­t officers is a large multiple of comparable paying jobs. Employees working in education training and library occupation­s, for example, earn a mean average wage of $22.40 per hour but rarely are threatened by work-related lifeand-death scenarios.

In decades of business, I’ve never once worried about a client meeting devolving to the point that someone pulls out a gun and starts shooting. But that’s a constant risk for police in metro areas, because they deal with volatile criminals daily and I almost never do.

To be clear, the circumstan­ces of their job are never an excuse for any police wrongdoing. But we owe the overwhelmi­ng ranks of honest, underpaid, put-their-life-on-the-line-first police officers far better than the past few months has given them.

Paul Harvey, as usual, was spot on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States