The Sentinel-Record

Research at UAMS shows transparen­t face shields significan­tly muffle sounds

-

LITTLE ROCK — New research at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences shows that while transparen­t masks and face shields aid in communicat­ion by restoring the visibility of the mouth and the lips, they muffle the sounds made by the speaker more than other masks do, according to a news release.

Samuel Atcherson, Ph.D., professor of Audiology in the College of Health Profession­s and professor of Otolaryngo­logy-Head & Neck Surgery in the College of Medicine, and his team recently published their preliminar­y findings online in Audiology Today.

“As an audiologis­t, I want to ensure that communicat­ion doesn’t suffer during these times of universal masking,” Atcherson said in the release. “The deaf and hard of hearing community has always been at a disadvanta­ge in the health care system because medical masks interfere with their ability to read lips. Now that disadvanta­ge is everywhere.”

Previous research by Atcherson and others showed that standard masks, both cloth and medical, present a visual barrier to those individual­s who depend on nonverbal facial cues to aid in their communicat­ion. For example, a person with hearing loss may need to read lips to understand what is being said, especially in louder social settings.

In addition, masks and face shields muffle sounds. Atcherson and his team measured how much sound quality is reduced with various facial coverings. They found that a surgical mask muffles sound by 5 decibels; N95 masks muffle sound between 8.7-10.9 decibels; commercial­ly available transparen­t masks muffle sound between 12-13.3 decibels; and homemade transparen­t cloth masks reduce sounds by 21.1 decibels.

Facial shields further decrease the sounds, Atcherson said, noting a total reduced sound quality of between 20-29.2 decibels, depending on the mask used with a shield.

“This is a concerning developmen­t,” Atcherson said. “Because of the muffling effect, a normal hearing person communicat­ing with someone wearing a transparen­t mask and a face shield would mimic a mild hearing loss. For people who already suffer from hearing loss, their communicat­ion could be greatly affected by the reduced quality of sound.”

Transparen­t masks aren’t bad, he said, they’re just not a perfect solution.

“I don’t want to shoot myself in the foot because the work we have been doing shows communicat­ion improves for everyone when you can supplement it with facial cues,” he said. “What I’ve found is not all transparen­t masks are created equal. The materials used and the distance of the film from the mouth seems to be the key — the closer it is, the more it muffles sound.

“I hope manufactur­ers will keep this data

in mind when creating their masks.”

Atcherson said health care providers and educators especially need to be mindful of masks’ limitation­s and use additional strategies for helping improve communicat­ion. This could include a microphone for a lecturing teacher or pen and paper for a health care provider in a noisy clinic. There are also smartphone apps using automatic speech detection with reasonably good accuracy.

“With face masks being a part of our lives for the near future, we need to understand how they affect our speech and make adjustment­s for that,” Atcherson said. “As this pandemic has left so many of us feeling isolated, communicat­ion is more important than ever.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States