The Sentinel-Record

Don’t let ‘vaccine guilt’ keep you from getting a shot

- Elizabeth Lahphier Elizabeth Lanphier is an assistant professor of Pediatrics and Ethics Center Faculty, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati. The Conversati­on is an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and

Over 100 million Americans have now received at least one dose of

COVID-19 vaccine. If you are one of them, you might feel lucky, relieved and possibly a little guilty.

Vaccine guilt — a feeling associated with getting immunized before others — is a phenomenon that has been reported in both the U.S. and overseas.

With the vaccine rollout expanding to more and more people, those who are able to work from home, can safely socially distance, or don’t have underlying medical conditions increasing their COVID-19 risks might wonder: Isn’t there someone who needs this more than I do?

As a medical ethicist and social philosophe­r, I believe people have good reason to feel vaccine guilt. But at the same time, they have every reason to still get vaccinated.

Vaccine guilt began nearly as soon as COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns did. The first COVID-19 vaccines were authorized for emergency use in December 2020, and eligibilit­y was narrowly restricted to front-line health care workers, other essential workers and those whose age or medical conditions placed them at greatest risk if they contracted

COVID-19. But even among this first at-risk cohort, reports emerged of vaccine recipients feeling vaccine guilt.

With the U.S. now administer­ing millions of doses a day and President Joe Biden vowing to expand eligibilit­y to every adult by May 1 (he has since moved the deadline for all US adults to be eligible to April 19), or possibly earlier — and some states reaching this target sooner — one might think vaccine guilt is going away. But it isn’t.

What vaccine guilt is — and isn’t

Vaccine guilt is different from the survivor’s guilt felt by some people who recognize that while they survived the pandemic to get vaccinated, others — perhaps including loved ones — did not.

It is also different from the guilt associated with lying about vaccine eligibilit­y, or otherwise skipping the line — for which culpabilit­y, remorse or a guilty conscience would be the most appropriat­e response.

For some, vaccine guilt is the sense that other groups, such as those working in grocery, care-taking or public transporta­tion jobs not initially included under “essential workers,” should have been prioritize­d before you. For others it is the wish that particular individual­s — like specific family members — could be vaccinated in your place.

Vaccine guilt might be experience­d as embarrassm­ent over having the good fortune of a vaccine or shame over feeling undeservin­g of a coveted dose.

Fundamenta­lly, vaccine allocation is about risk. Early or late vaccinatio­n eligibilit­y is not, or at least should not be, an assessment of positive or negative personal worth or social value. Allocation should be about how best to mitigate COVID-19 risks and stem the spread of disease while working toward herd immunity.

Yet vaccine guilt reflects the reality that some risks have been unfairly assessed in vaccine allocation. For example, assessing risk based on age without accounting for disparitie­s in life expectancy between white and Black Americans resulted in fewer Black Americans initially being eligible for vaccinatio­n — despite Black Americans experienci­ng higher rates of COVID-19 cases and fatalities.

Meanwhile, some groups and individual­s at increased risk for COVID-19 have been largely excluded from vaccine prioritiza­tion, such as incarcerat­ed individual­s or those with certain disabiliti­es. Reasons to feel guilty

Despite increased eligibilit­y for vaccinatio­n, there remain significan­t barriers to access for some communitie­s. Many of these barriers are structural and connect to social and economic inequities. Obtaining a vaccinatio­n appointmen­t often requires time and access to resources, such as a phone or internet, to search for and book a slot. Speaking a language in which appointmen­t informatio­n is available, having reliable transporta­tion to and from the appointmen­t, and being able to get the time off work or care-taking duties creates other barriers for some groups.

Data show that U.S. counties with the lowest share of people living in poverty and less COVID-19 community transmissi­on have been vaccinated at higher rates. These counties also tend to have a higher share of residents with health insurance and fewer high-risk medical conditions than communitie­s with more vulnerable population­s. Similarly, the rate of vaccinatio­n in whiter counties is higher than in counties with a higher proportion of racial and ethnic minority residents.

Additional data report significan­tly higher rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths among Black and Hispanic people in the U.S., yet in many states, Black and Hispanic people have been vaccinated at lower rates than white people.

So even if someone follows the rules of vaccinatio­n eligibilit­y, it doesn’t mean the rules are necessaril­y fair or do a good job ensuring those most vulnerable in society are being vaccinated.

What can we do about vaccine guilt?

My scholarshi­p suggests that people have individual responsibi­lities as members of a society, including for the society’s health care practices. This is because we are interconne­cted in a shared society in which we rely on, benefit from, and can sometimes cause disadvanta­ge to others.

As such, one good reason to feel vaccine guilt is it helps people recognize their participat­ion in — and sometimes advantage because of — unjust and unfair systems. It can also spur a push for better accountabi­lity and equity within one’s social and political organizati­ons in charge of health care systems in general and COVID-19 response specifical­ly.

Although overall rates of vaccinatio­n are important and help protect those most medically vulnerable, the goal of herd immunity is not an excuse for unfairness in vaccine rollout. Plus data confirm that equitable vaccinatio­n is better for public health. Vaccinatin­g highest-risk communitie­s first reduces more cases, saves more lives and slows the pandemic faster.

So, where does this leave those feeling guilty about an upcoming vaccine appointmen­t?

They should certainly keep the appointmen­t. But perhaps they could consider ways to help others get vaccinated. Helping people who lack internet access to sign up and safely driving someone who lacks transporta­tion to an appointmen­t are two options.

Or people can donate to nonprofit organizati­ons providing vaccinatio­n outreach in underserve­d communitie­s or support community health centers.

People can also lobby political representa­tives for greater health equity in the first place.

In a country that can afford and produce vaccines in such a scale and time scale, perhaps there is good reason to feel some guilt. Although shots will soon be available to all, the burden of the virus has disproport­ionately fallen on low-income families and communitie­s of color — the same communitie­s that may face additional barriers to getting vaccinated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States