The Sentinel-Record

Immigratio­n the deal breaker on Elder

- Ruben Navarrette Copyright 2021 Washington Post Writers group

EDITOR’S NOTE: It’s America’s great paradox. This is the land of immigrants, and yet Americans have never liked immigrants. Today, we don’t just have a broken border and a broken system. We also have a broken discourse. It’s no wonder we can’t solve our immigratio­n problem. We don’t even know how to talk about it. When Americans look at the U.S.-Mexico border, or peek into the kitchens of their favorite restaurant, or come clean about who is doing the chores in their own homes, they see different realities. This series — written by the grandson of a Mexican immigrant who has covered the issue for 30 years — takes a clear, honest and unflinchin­g look at why America’s grand promise to take in the “huddled masses” and “wretched refuse” has been so difficult to keep.

SAN DIEGO — As a Mexican American from the farmland of Central California, I was raised on Merle Haggard, gun racks, and biscuits smothered in gravy.

The Democratic Party and its wholly owned subsidiary, the liberal media, don’t know it, but this deep blue state is home to a good many conservati­ve Latinos.

Larry Elder and I agree on nine out of 10 issues. The tenth is immigratio­n. There, Elder is wrong six ways from Sunday.

So, when I spoke recently to my friend of nearly three decades — who is now the leading Republican option to replace California Gov. Gavin Newsom in the Sept. 14 recall election — guess what I wanted to talk about.

As many California­ns have now figured out, Elder is scary smart. You have to be to go from Crenshaw High School in the inner city of Los Angeles to Brown University and the University of Michigan Law School.

Yet, when the subject turns to immigratio­n, Elder’s brain gets commandeer­ed by politics and a desire to please the nativist white base of the minuscule California GOP. And he says things that are dumb.

For instance, when he talks about eliminatin­g birthright citizenshi­p for U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, or denying education and hospital care to the undocument­ed, or making local cops hand over undocument­ed motorists to federal immigratio­n agents, it makes me wonder if my friend was absent the day they taught “law” in law school.

But we agree that immigrants are a net benefit. That is evident in California, which is estimated to be home to the largest number of immigrants in the country — both legal and illegal.

One time, Elder told me that he came home to find his housekeepe­r on her hands and knees cleaning the carpet with a portable car vacuum, because she couldn’t find anything else. Shocked, he helped the woman up.

What struck my friend — who made clear to me that the housekeepe­r was in the country legally — was how hard the woman was willing to work.

I’m not surprised. Hard work is sacred to Latinos. It’s one of the reasons that many non-Latinos are afraid to compete with us. Hard work was also sacred in the Elder household, where Larry’s father, Randolph, preached this gospel to his children.

I wonder if Elder realizes that Latino immigrants — including those without documents — are his simpaticos. He might. His campaign recently put out Spanish-language radio ads.

“Hard work wins,” I said. “That’s the Elder family slogan, right? Well, brother, no one understand­s work, and the value of hard work, more than immigrants, and that includes illegal immigrants. Why attack them?”

“Well, that’s right,” Elder responded. “Look, I’ve often said, if I were someone living in Mexico and I have a family and I care about my family, I absolutely understand why some people would try to come here illegally. I totally get it. There is no point in demonizing these people. But we are a nation of laws, and we do need to be able to know who is in the country.”

In 1994, Elder opposed Propositio­n 187, which I describe as an “evil” ballot initiative that sought to deny benefits to undocument­ed immigrants.

“You call it evil,” he said. “I’d call it ill-advised. I voted against it because the Supreme Court had already ruled [in the 1982 case, Plyler v Doe] that it is unconstitu­tional to inquire about a child’s immigratio­n status in public school. And I knew that if Prop. 187 got passed, it would be challenged, and the courts were going to throw it out. And that’s just what happened. So I thought it was going to be a big fat waste of time.”

The Larry Elder I used to know, and liked, would scold callers to his radio show when they griped that undocument­ed immigrants were taking American jobs — jobs those callers didn’t want anyway. “Brother,” I asked. “What happened to that Larry Elder?” “Well, that Larry Elder is still right here,” he snapped. “My dad came here [to California] without two nickels to rub together, with an eighth-grade dropout education. I think I’m more relatable than most Republican­s have been in the past. The Republican Party is going to get a fresh image, and I’m going to be the face of that fresh image.”

Recent polls show that Latinos are rallying around Newsom, and the media is primed to tell the story of how that neglected constituen­cy rescued a Democratic governor who only recently discovered they exist.

You see, in California, the GOP isn’t the only party that needs freshening up.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States