The Sentinel-Record

Wrong time, and not a permanent solution

- George Pritchett Guest column

County Judge Darryl Mahoney and the Garland County Quorum Count are proposing a new temporary five-eighths cent sales tax to be voted on Feb. 8 in a special election, i.e., a friends and family, low-turnout election.

Their timing coincides with the “sunsetting” (end) of the then-new temporary five-eighths cent tax passed approximat­ely five years ago to match $30,000,000 in state funds to construct the expressway extension to Hot Springs Village and provide approximat­ely $25,000,000 to be spent on county and municipali­ties’ streets, road and bridges. This existing five-year fiveeighth­s cent sales sunsets (ends) in approximat­ely June 2022.

Looking back 10 years ago, the public approved ballot issues to construct the new Garland County Detention Center using a then-new temporary five-eighths cent constructi­on sales tax to sunset (end) in approximat­ely five years along with a new permanent three-eighths cent sales tax to fund jail operations. Near the sunset (end) of the five-eighths cent temporary constructi­on tax, the then-county judge and quorum court proposed a new temporary five-eighths cent sales tax to provide the necessary “matching money” to the state to build the expressway extension. We were told then the tax would sunset (end) once approximat­ely $54,000,000 was raised.

There’s a pattern here. Before either temporary tax ended, they have asked for a new temporary fiveeighth­s sales tax. I submit our county judges, along with the quorum court, were disingenuo­us in their proposals about “temporary taxes” or taxes “sunsetting” (ending) since before either sunset, they have asked for another “new temporary five-eighths cent sales tax.”

I predict that if the Feb. 8 ballot measure passes, Garland

County officials will again be asking for another new temporary sales tax, likely five-eighths cent, before it sunsets (ends).

This is not a permanent solution. There’s a serious problem with the proposed new temporary five-eighths cent sales tax. It won’t solve the problems with Garland County roads, streets and bridges. Currently, the county spends $1,800,000 annually for streets, roads and bridges in unincorpor­ated Garland County. A person close to our county judge told me it would take 70 years and $126,000,000 to do the work spending at this rate. The proposed tax will produce approximat­ely $70,000,000 with $42,000,000 going to improve unincorpor­ated Garland County roads, streets and bridges and $26,000,000 going to municipali­ties, with the city of Hot Springs receiving the largest portion since it is the largest incorporat­ed city. The $42,000,000 plus the $1,800,000 currently budgeted will leave a mammoth unmet need in unincorpor­ated Garland County of approximat­ely $75,000,000 based on their estimates.

It is the wrong time. Garland County citizens have suffered through a pandemic that isn’t over and many haven’t recovered from its impact. There’s also continuing uncertaint­y as to when the pandemic will end. Another problem is the rampant inflation affecting everyone with higher housing costs, higher utilities cost, motor fuel increases, increased water and sewer rates in our community and much more.

To summarize, it is a bad proposal and it won’t provide a permanent solution. Citizens should defeat this ballot measure. Doing so will send a message to county officials we want a permanent solution and no more temporary taxes that fail to solve the problems our county and municipali­ties face with our streets, roads and bridges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States