The Sentinel-Record

A playground fight

June 9 Fort Worth Star-Telegram

-

So far, the pending impeachmen­t trial of Ken Paxton is looking like something between a playground spat and the setup to a barroom brawl. The attorney general’s trial in the Senate is a time when it’s critical to show that order, decorum and justice prevail.

Paxton hired a prominent, boisterous Houston-based attorney, Tony Buzbee, and he’s already labeled the impeachmen­t process “baloney” and a “sham.” …

Even if it were a sham — and the accusation­s of wrongdoing at several turns are anything but — there must be a fair and serious process to vet wrongdoing at the highest levels of Texas government. The House impeachmen­t vote was 121-23, an overwhelmi­ng partisan indictment of Paxton’s behavior and fitness for office.

Calling that an embarrassm­ent says a lot more about Buzbee’s state of mind than it does the House’s work. As the kids say: Buzbee’s attitude is giving off vibes of imposter syndrome. So far, Buzbee really is all hat, no cattle.

It’s part of a pattern from Paxton and his allies from the moment the House investigat­ion was made clear. They’ve blustered, attempted to intimidate, made political threats and now, seem to be trying to sway the Senate jurors who will decide Paxton’s fate.

Over 40 minutes, Buzbee and his partner, Dan Cogdell, presented little firm evidence and again spent most of their time talking about the process in the House rather than the serious charges against their client.

Paxton is welcome to hire whomever he deems is best, and Buzbee’s got a great track record. But if his lawyer’s first step is to talk smack, Paxton is either in really deep water or he’ll be cleared on day one, such will be the extraordin­ary evidence demonstrat­ing his innocence.

We’re not apt to label someone guilty before a trial, but if we really take at face value what Buzbee is telling reporters, then the entire thing that’s gone on has been a huge lesson in gaslightin­g, not to mention a massive waste of taxpayer-funded time. What are the chances?

It’s one thing to robustly believe in your client’s innocence; it’s another to boldly claim, as Buzbee did, that “Ken Paxton will never be convicted.” That raises alarm bells of conspiracy at worst, arrogance at best.

During the news conference, Buzbee flashed a bank statement intended to disprove one of the many allegation­s, that Paxton donor Nate Paul, had paid for extensive renovation­s at the politician’s Austin home in exchange for aid from Paxton’s legal office. The bank statement showed a payment by Paxton to a constructi­on company, Cupertino Builders, that is tied to Paul.

“Cupertino Builders was formed in Texas the same month as the payment Buzbee cited was made, according to Texas corporatio­n filings, and was dissolved less than two years later, in June 2022,” the Wall

Street Journal reported.

In other words, the timing suggests an effort to cover tracks on the renovation work.

Of course, there’s swagger on the House prosecutio­n side, too. The House — which is chock full of accomplish­ed lawyers — nonetheles­s hired legendary attorneys Dick DeGuerin and Rusty Hardin. …

All of this is aimed at public opinion, but more so at the 31 senators who will serve as jurors. Sure, impeachmen­t is a political process, and political considerat­ion is inevitable. …

The fact that four pretentiou­s superlawye­rs are involved does not bode well for a solemn, dignified process based on facts and evidence. Senators must set rules that encourage decorum and seriousnes­s and a real public airing of the facts and evidence. They must decide how to address potential conflicts among the senators, none bigger than Sen. Angela Paxton’s. The AG’s wife represents part of Collin County, the same seat Ken Paxton held before his statewide election. Other senators may be called as witnesses.

Paxton’s defenders will be tempted to try to win a vote to immediatel­y acquit or toss the charges. Senators must resist that. A full, public airing of the charges and evidence is important to the public’s confidence in its government.

A serious process requires serious rules and serious participan­ts. So far, we’ve seen too much game-playing instead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States