The Signal

Yankees take foolish risk in letting Girardi go

- Bob Nightengal­e bnighten@usatoday.com USA TODAY Sports

The news was stunning,

HOUSTON staggering, mystifying.

Joe Girardi, who had his finest year in his managerial career, leading a young New York Yankees to within one game of the World Series, is out as manager.

Start spreading the rumors, because this makes no sense. None. What in the world just happened?

This can’t have anything to do with a botched instant replay non-call.

It can’t have anything to do with the club’s performanc­e.

My goodness, it’s incredible the Yankees even made the playoffs as a wild-card team, let alone knock off the Minnesota Twins in the wild-card game, stun the Cleveland Indians in the American League Division Series and come within one game of beating the Houston Astros in the AL Championsh­ip Series.

No, this is merely a move coming after general manager Brian Cashman’s recommenda­tion to ownership that Girardi not be retained.

Funny thing is, Girardi’s suddenly the hottest name on the free agent managerial market, with the Washington Nationals and Philadelph­ia Phillies still seeking managers.

The Yankees have done some awfully strange things over the years, from the Billy Martin hirings and firings, to the A-Rod drama, to George Steinbrenn­er’s tyrant ways, but this one is a doozy.

And it makes absolutely no sense.

Sure, there was occasional friction between Girardi and the front office, but what club doesn’t have its difference­s?

Maybe the Yankees brass was offended when Girardi made it appear it would ultimately be his call.

And indication­s are Girardi was getting squeezed from above and below, with the flare-ups grating on his bosses and his players wondering if he’ll always be so tightly wound.

Still, the man is a winner, and the Yankees had a winning record every season he was there.

And now we have a perhaps unpreceden­ted situation in which three playoff teams kicked their managers to the curb, with the Boston Red Sox bailing on John Farrell as the Yankees did Girardi and the Nationals Dusty Baker.

What makes the latter two moves particular­ly mystifying is the limited upside. The Nationals won 97 games this year and 95 the year before and again will be heavily favored to win the National League East, losing two Game 5 NLDS crapshoots in each of the last two seasons.

The Yankees were almost universall­y acknowledg­ed as way ahead of schedule when they won 91 games, captured the wild-card game and then stunned the Indians in the Division Series before Minute Maid Park and Justin Verlander stopped them cold.

The new Yankees manager will inherit Judge and Gary Sanchez and Didi Gregorius and whichever free agent plums they pick a year from now.

Girardi rarely looked graceful in his job, but he was very good at it.

And how much better will the manager be? Will a young, playerfrie­ndly, analytics-wise manager really provide that much more than Girardi?

Can a respected organizati­onal man such as VP of baseball operations Tim Naehring make a seamless transition to manager? Can a young, emerging candidate — be it Josh Paul internally or any number of rising stars in other organizati­ons — handle a clubhouse that will almost certainly add at some point a mega personalit­y such as Bryce Harper to its mix of high-profile youngsters?

Did we forget how difficult it is to manage the Yankees?

Apparently, the Yankees did. And that’s the most nonsensica­l thing of all.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States