The Signal

Trump may not comply with security clearance law

- Gregory Korte

WASHINGTON — President Trump signed a bill Tuesday aimed at reducing the backlog of security clearance investigat­ions — but later reserved the right not to comply with it on constituti­onal grounds.

In a signing statement Tuesday night, Trump said provisions of the bill — the Securely Expediting Clearances Through Reporting Transparen­cy Act of 2018, or SECRET Act — encroach on his authority as commander-in-chief.

Among the provisions Trump objected to: A section requiring the White House Office of Administra­tion to report on its process for conducting security clearance investigat­ions for White House officials.

That process came under scrutiny in January when it was revealed that Staff Secretary Rob Porter — the official responsibl­e for the entire paper flow in and out of the Oval Office — had been working without a permanent security clearance for more than a year. His clearance had been held up because of allegation­s of domestic violence from two ex-wives.

Senior adviser Jared Kushner — the president’s son-in-law — also had his security clearance downgraded in the aftermath of Porter’s departure. He had to correct his security clearance applicatio­n form after neglecting to report contacts with foreign agents.

In issuing the signing statement, Trump resorted to a presidenti­al tool that presidents have used to avoid vetoing bills even as they voice constituti­onal objections to them. By putting those objections in a separate statement, presidents signal how the law should be interprete­d and enforced.

But Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., said members of Congress “fully expect the administra­tion to implement this law.”

“Congress was clear in passing this bipartisan legislatio­n that the administra­tion needs to reduce the security clearance backlog so that we can meet our growing national security needs,” said Connolly, a co-sponsor of the bill and ranking Democrat on the House Government Operations subcommitt­ee. “Signing statements may make presidents feel good, but they have absolutely no force of law.”

The security clearance bill passed both the House and Senate unanimousl­y after the National Background Investigat­ions Bureau stopped releasing statistics about the backlog in security clearances. Most of the bill simply instructs the administra­tion to provide Congress with reports on the problems causing that backlog.

But Trump said in his statement that the Constituti­on makes him responsibl­e for the security clearance process.

“I have stressed that the national security of the United States depends on a rigorous security clearance process,” the statement said. “As the Supreme Court has acknowledg­ed, however, the Constituti­on vests in the president the authority to classify informatio­n relating to the national security and to control access to such informatio­n.”

Trump also argued that because the Constituti­on gives the president the power to recommend to Congress measures he believes are “necessary and expedient,” Congress can’t tell the intelligen­ce community to make recommenda­tions unless the president signs off on them.

 ?? OLIVER CONTRERAS / POOL/EPA-EFE ?? President Trump listens during a meeting with South Korean President Moon Jae-in at the White House Tuesday.
OLIVER CONTRERAS / POOL/EPA-EFE President Trump listens during a meeting with South Korean President Moon Jae-in at the White House Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States