The Signal

SCV Water sues Whittaker Corp.

- By Jim Holt Signal Senior Staff Writer

SCV Water filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against the Whittaker Corp., seeking to cover the cost of removing two harmful contaminan­ts — volatile organic compounds and perchlorat­e — from the Santa Clarita Valley groundwate­r basin.

The lawsuit filed in the U.S. Central District Court of California comes just months ahead of when Whittaker contends the cleanup will be complete.

“Despite the recent news accounts and public relations charm campaign to depict the Whittaker site cleanup as ‘nearly complete,’ the legacy of their historic contaminat­ion of the community’s groundwate­r basin remains to be fully addressed,” Matt Stone, general manager of SCV Water, said in a prepared statement Thursday.

The lawsuit comes six months ahead of the expected finish date Whittaker had given the community for the

completion of its cleanup of 996 acres of contaminat­ed land in the heart of Santa Clarita.

“The mandates issued to Whittaker in previous settlement­s do not adequately address the continuing spread of perchlorat­e contaminat­ion, and do not require Whittaker to address VOCs at all,” Stone said in the prepared statement.

“It is Whittaker’s responsibi­lity to reimburse the water providers and our community for the cost of replacemen­t water, remediatio­n and additional groundwate­r treatment,” he said.

Eric G. Lardiere, senior vice president, secretary and general counsel for Whittaker Corp., was reportedly out of state on business Thursday and was not immediatel­y available for comment, according to Whittaker officials. Lardiere has attended and participat­ed in several of the quarterly stakeholde­r meetings held at Santa Clarita City Hall, and is expected to issue a comment.

Contaminat­ed land

Nearly 1,000 acres of Whittaker-Bermite land became contaminat­ed after more than a half-century of weapons and explosives testing at the site.

Dynamite was manufactur­ed there in the mid-’30s by the Los Angeles Powder Co.

In 1936, the Halifax Explosives Co. moved in and spent the next six years making fireworks.

After that, according to research conducted by the Toxic Substances Department, E.P. Halliburto­n Inc. reportedly began making oil field explosives at the site.

Coated magnesium flash flares and other photoflash devices used in the Vietnam War were manufactur­ed by the Bermite Powder Co. Between 1942 and 1967, the company also made detonators, fuses and stabilized red phosphorou­s.

The Whittaker Corp. carried on the explosive tradition, making ammunition rounds, boosters, flares, detonators, signal cartridges, glow plugs (used to heat the combustion chamber of diesel engines in cold conditions), tracer and pyrophoric pellets (fragments that spark spontaneou­sly), igniters, ignition compositio­ns, explosive bolts (designed to separate cleanly along a set fracture), powder charges, rocket motors, gas generators and missile parts.

The Whittaker site was used for munitions manufactur­ing until 1987.

Today, Whittaker Corp. manufactur­es fluid control valves and control systems; fire and overheat detection products; radio frequency and high-temperatur­e cable and cable systems.

The site itself was found to be contaminat­ed with very high levels of ammonium perchlorat­e, as well as VOCs perchloroe­thylene and trichloroe­thylene.

The site continues to be subject to a cleanup order under the supervisio­n of the state Department of Toxic Substances Control.

Last month, Jose Diaz, senior project manager for the Department of Toxic Substances Control, told stakeholde­rs — including SCV Water officials — seated at a round table at City Hall that the cleanup would be completed by the year’s end.

Litigation history

Wednesday’s filing of the lawsuit was not the first time water providers have had to resort to litigation to compel Whittaker to clean up the damages its operations have caused in the community’s groundwate­r basin.

In 2000, SCV Water’s predecesso­r — the Castaic Lake Water Agency — filed suit for reimbursem­ent of response costs, replacemen­t water purchase costs, ongoing wellhead treatment and well replacemen­t.

In 2003, Federal Court Judge Howard Matz issued an opinion finding that Whittaker and others were liable under the Comprehens­ive Environmen­tal Response, Compensati­on and Recovery Act for perchlorat­e contaminat­ion found in SCV water supply wells.

In 2007, Whittaker entered into a settlement agreement for the remediatio­n or replacemen­t of five production wells.

Currently, SCV Water operates two well treatment facilities — covering three impacted wells — which use a special resin designed to remove perchlorat­e molecules from the water.

Since that time, additional wells not included in the original settlement have been impacted by or threatened with perchlorat­e contaminat­ion, and VOCs have been detected at a number of wells, according to a news release issued by SCV Water on Thursday.

Additional treatment facilities and operations will be needed to address these.

‘Responsibi­lities’

Informal discussion­s with the Whittaker Corp. have not brought resolution, so the complaint was filed, according to the SCV Water release.

“We regularly collect and test water samples from every well in our system,” said Jim Leserman, senior engineer with SCV Water. “Our efforts confirm that the drinking water being served in the SCV is safe, and meets all state and federal drinking water health standards, and it’s important that Whittaker continues to fund the ongoing efforts.”

Informatio­n on the status of the Whittaker Bermite contaminat­ion and cleanup can be found at the city of Santa Clarita’s informatio­nal page www.whittakerb­ermite.com.

“Whittaker should step up and cover the cost of this remediatio­n,” added Stone. “Unfortunat­ely, history suggests they will continue to stall in hopes of postponing or avoiding their responsibi­lities.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States