The Signal

Six Reasons to Vote Yes on Propositio­n 6

- Jonathan KRAUT Jonathan Kraut directs a private investigat­ions firm, is the CFO private security firm, is the COO of at an Acting Conservato­ry, is a published author, and Democratic Party activist. His column reflects his own views and not necessaril­y th

Most of us are voting by mail-in ballot, which should be arriving in about two weeks. So it is not too early to start talking about California Propositio­n 6 on the Nov. 6 ballot. Before we review the six reasons why I recommend we should vote Yes on 6, I think it best to review why this issue is before us.

Last year the state Legislatur­e assessed a 12-cent fuel tax per gallon and increased vehicle registrati­on fees through Senate Bill 1, called the Road Repair and Accountabi­lity Act of 2017. This equals about $2 in extra tax for every fill-up on every car you see on the road. Thus, the state Assembly and Senate levied an estimated $5.2 billion-per-year tax on fuel for each of the next 10 years.

And as we all know, after this $52 billion is collected, politician­s would try to convince us that it was not enough and another $50-plus billion will be needed to keep our roads open.

Our slick politician­s, knowing that there would be an outcry after the passage of SB 1, immediatel­y created Propositio­n 69, which would pretend to fix the outrage they had created.

But this was a lure to get voters to approve a measure that would lift restrictio­ns on how the gas tax increase monies would be spent. From the start, the Legislatur­e had passed a bill with restrictio­ns that could be re-framed with voter approval to divert transporta­tion funds to be spent on anything the Legislatur­e wishes.

The Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office mislabeled the measure as, “A YES vote on this measure means: The Legislatur­e will be required under the state Constituti­on to continue to spend revenues from recently enacted fuel taxes and vehicle fees on transporta­tion purposes (such as repairing roads and improving transit).”

The Legislatur­e with SB 1 had already earmarked all tax revenues from diesel and gas sales to go to “transporta­tion.” In reality, passage of Propositio­n 69 prohibits the use of taxes raised on diesel sales only and gives permission to spend gasoline tax revenues on items other than actual transporta­tion, which was previously not permitted.

In addition, the Transporta­tion in the Road Repair and Accountabi­lity Act of 2017 was not in fact designated just for road repair but included movement-related expenditur­es such as studying transporta­tion, promoting highspeed rail, implementi­ng bicycle lanes, supplement­ing the ongoing losses caused by failed public transporta­tion and settling vehicle-related lawsuits.

California Propositio­n 6 is called the “Voter Approval for Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative.”

This worthy ballot initiative, if passed, will repeal the gas and diesel tax increases and vehicle fees that were enacted in 2017 and therefore cancel out Prop. 69. Further, Prop. 6 would require voter approval for fuel tax and vehicle fee increases in the future and de-fang the Legislatur­e to some extent.

Six reasons why to vote yes vote on Propositio­n 6: 1) This would repeal fuel tax increases and vehicle fees that were enacted in 2017, forcing the Legislatur­e to spend more wisely the monies we already pay in taxes at the pump.

2) We would curb the diversion of our gas tax money to things other than transporta­tion.

3) We could finally clip the wings of the “high-speed rail project,” which we already know can never be competed and is already technologi­cally obsolete.

4) We would require voter approval (via ballot propositio­ns) for any new fuel taxes, ending the state Legislatur­e’s ability to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes or vehicle fees in the future.

5) The slow-down of non-essential projects, for whom only unions benefit, would cause a reduction in cash-flow the unions use to buy off politician­s.

6) Voting yes signals to our representa­tives that even this well-developed scheme to steal our money and other future schemes will be eventually thwarted.

The real culprit is, however, not the Legislatur­e but the Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office, which falsely labeled Prop. 69 and obscured the true intent of the measure — to allow the Legislatur­e to use gasoline taxes for any purpose.

While some in the Legislatur­e are simply grown children pandering for power, recognitio­n and ego, our servants, whom we pay at the Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office, have no excuse to deceive the taxpayers.

After we approve Propositio­n 6, I hope the Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office, “The California Legislatur­e’s NonPartisa­n and Fiscal Advisor,” is investigat­ed, officials go to jail, and they are forced to become “non-partisan” as promised.

This worthy ballot initiative, if passed, will repeal the gas and diesel tax increases and vehicle fees that were enacted in 2017 and therefore cancel out Prop. 69.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States