The Signal

Anti-Establishm­ent Establishm­ent and Its Impact in 2020

- Jonathan KRAUT

Many, like myself, had hoped that our president would undergo a maturity transforma­tion once holding our highest office in the land. But Donald Trump’s insults and slanders, lashing out at any naysayers, and accusatory rhetoric continued even after inaugurati­on day.

After initially downplayin­g the dangers posed by the coronaviru­s pandemic, I and others still expected our president to finally rise to the occasion and accept the mantle of a unifying leader. The expectatio­n was that Trump would finally abandon the practice of dispensing all the blame on others while embracing his new role of coordinato­r in chief.

At this moment, most of America wants and needs a leader who is willing to harness a cooperativ­e spirit — to coordinate resources with the states and private industry, and to offer unwavering support of the science that will save lives and in time help reopen our economy.

Most understand that together a new sense of spirit and cooperatio­n typical of an internatio­nal crisis or a nation at war is our way past this pandemic.

Unity is why government­s form — for the common good, for enhanced safety in numbers, and to benefit from a coordinate­d and purposeful society.

While earning an MBA eons ago, I recall reviewing the basic types of leadership styles found in organizati­ons.

Laissez-faire leadership is the approach where the views and actions of subordinat­es who execute policies as experts in their fields are brought together by a leader who simply melds these actions into a general process.

Autocratic/authoritar­ian leadership is characteri­zed by a dictatoria­l personalit­y who directs and controls every aspect of organizati­onal activity. Autocratic leaders generally exaggerate the threats of an actual or fictional enemy, and by using fear, gather cooperatio­n against this “enemy.” Transactio­nal leaders manifest systems of rewards and punishment­s in relationsh­ip to perceived cooperatio­n and performanc­e. These leaders use pay raises, recognitio­n, compliment­s and promotion as rewards for those who cooperate while simultaneo­usly using reputation smears, firing, threats and shaming as punishment­s for those who do not achieve stated goals or follow the official narrative.

Democratic leadership is characteri­zed by a hybrid approach that blends laissez-faire and autocratic leadership. These leaders encourage participat­ion from subordinat­es in forming recommenda­tions, but then they make the final decision the organizati­on is expected to fully embrace and adopt.

Transforma­tional leaders attempt to create a vision for the organizati­on and frequently restate what their vision looks like to inspire cooperatio­n and stimulate progress. Transforma­tional leaders attempt to clearly define why there is a need for change and coordinate evolution through clear instructio­ns and communicat­ion.

Trump’s opportunit­y to transform himself and thereby avoid thousands of needless deaths has unfortunat­ely now come and gone.

Instead of bringing the 50 lifeboats to safety, state-bystate, to avoid the massive tides of death threatenin­g to tip each over, Trump’s policy is to blame the lifeboat captains while denying their passengers safe harbor. And Trump incites mutiny among these 50 crews as well.

Even with tens of thousands dying in just the last month and the knowledge that social distancing is working, Trump is now railing against Centers for Disease Control guidelines — the guidelines his hand-picked experts have establishe­d and he has approved.

Inciting rebellion and distrust of against first the Democrats and the press, Trump has expanded his vitriol and rhetoric to include any governor or commentato­r who has a different view than his, his own medical experts, and even against the very safety guidelines he himself recommends.

On the same day Trump proclaimed to the world that social distancing is working, he also tweets that it is time to end social distancing and to “Liberate Minnesota,” “Liberate Michigan,” and “Liberate Virginia.”

According to Trump’s own criteria, these states where he has rallied discontent and supports insurrecti­on do not meet his criteria for opening up the economy.

Trump is inciting a tea party-like, anti-establishm­ent movement of the very government he leads.

It seems we are doomed by Trump’s permanent blend of autocratic and transactio­nal styles of leadership. Trump is unable to evolve into something better or someone more effective — a transforma­tional leader.

Who are the geniuses who are willing to revolt against the Trump administra­tion because Trump says to do so?

If a madman issues crazy, conflictin­g advice, how do we characteri­ze those who willingly support these destructiv­e ideas that create more death? Patriots?

Please stay home, be safe, and pray at home.

It seems we are doomed by Trump’s permanent blend of autocratic and transactio­nal styles of leadership. Trump is unable to evolve into something better or someone more effective — a transforma­tional leader.

Jonathan Kraut directs a private investigat­ions firm, is the CFO of a private security firm, is the COO of an acting conservato­ry, is a published author, and Democratic Party activist. His column reflects his own views and not necessaril­y those of The Signal or of other organizati­ons.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States