The Signal

Is Free Money Bad? Sometimes, Yes, it Can Be

- Jonathan KRAUT DEMOCRATIC VOICES

Many would argue that all Democrats are in favor of funding the poor by extracting taxes from the rich. While this often appears to be the case, I for one and many of my Democratic colleagues are cringing right now as free money giveaways lately seem routine.

The Biden administra­tion’s unemployme­nt supplement­s, California COVID-19 relief packages and Los Angeles city free utilities, rent and cash have all contribute­d to eroding the value of money itself. Economic assessment­s indicate our inflation rate is at over 5% this year.

Extra money for everyone means those on a fixed income have less buying power.

A surplus of funds also means the wealthy, who own assets and the means of production, are unaffected as they can charge more to keep pace with inflationa­ry increases.

In my last Signal submission, I griped about how my business operations are desperatel­y seeking to hire more staff. Given extended unemployme­nt benefits, sincere job candidates are rare and tend to overrate their value, often refusing reasonable employment.

Truck drivers, retail staff and restaurant workers are still in short supply nationwide. There are more job opportunit­ies than job seekers. These manpower shortages continue as potential employees are still at home waiting for their benefits to run out.

Free money has initiated a pool of disinteres­ted manpower, which necessitat­es businesses to pay more for labor, and therefore charges to consumers are passed along to you and me.

Since June, rental rates, home prices, gas costs, retail prices and food have all dramatical­ly increased because many have more to money spend.

The just-announced Los Angeles city free-money giveaway is among another disturbing trend. The pilot program intends to give away $1,000 a month to 3,000 households for one year.

While we may think this plan enacted by our giant neighbor to the south would have little effect on us up here, this Los Angeles plan will be just another useless folly disguised as an anti-recession measure.

The L.A. plan is to disburse $6 million. At the end of one year, those recipients who stop receiving free cash will revert back to earlier want and financial struggle.

The only good news here is that retailers will have sold a ton of new flatscreen­s, shoes and high-end cell phones.

As an MBA candidate studying economic theory, I was taught that the value of money is what the public thinks it is. Electronic digits represente­d in your online bank account or paper with a number on it have no actual value. Those numbers are simply a representa­tion of hope — hope that someone else will accept this numerical value as you do. Crypto currency illustrate­s this point perfectly. Bitcoin for example, like currency, is a concept. The value of Bitcoin is driven by what people think it will be worth. Bitcoin has no assets nor is it backed by any government, but is valued based on hope.

Speculatio­n drives the increased and decreased value of money. If many think money is rare or will be more valuable, its worth increases.

If many think money is in ample supply or will devalue, its worth is less.

The good news is that economists and the Federal Reserve know these observatio­ns about the money supply and labor.

Despite our short-term anguish, I applaud the concept of massive cash injection into the economy. True, the labor pool is feeble, moderate inflation is upon us, and money is perceived as having less value.

But the Fed’s moves have not only saved hundreds of thousands of businesses from closing, but also have averted a massive recession. A broad recession weakens everyone’s financial position — creating more destructio­n than mild temporary inflation.

As uncomforta­ble as these policies have been, the choices were clear.

On the one hand, we would have a little bit too much aid for a while. One the other hand, we would promote the shuttering of millions of businesses, wiping out personal savings of half the nation, and disabling much of the economy for the long term.

In 2022 I expect interest rates will go up, opportunit­ies for free cash will vaporize and unemployme­nt subsidies will dry up.

These manipulati­ons will indicate money has greater value and inflation will subside.

While I take issue with the recent Los Angeles attempt to try to bribe people out of poverty and some similarly wanton state initiative­s, in fact the Joe Biden administra­tion is on the right track.

In the coming months we will see subsidy programs end and our economy, more powerful than before, flow freely once again.

Jonathan Kraut directs a private investigat­ions agency, is the CEO of a private security firm, is the COO of an accredited acting conservato­ry, a published author, and Democratic Party activist. His column reflects his own views and not necessaril­y those of The Signal or of other organizati­ons.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States