The Standard Journal

Governing is much harder than winning

- By STEVE and COKIE ROBERTS

America is so deeply divided today that voters backing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton don't just live on different continents from each other. They live on different planets. If current trends continue, and Clinton becomes the next president, she will find that governing this fractured country is a much harder job than winning the election.

Polls consistent­ly show sharp splits along critical fault lines: race and gender, education and geography, ideology and party. But those fissures did not open this year. They've been widening for decades, fueled by tectonic shifts in the American political landscape.

Voters are sorting themselves into like-minded communitie­s, listening to media outlets that reinforce their preconcept­ions, and growing more hostile to others who don't share their views.

"We've become a nation of ideologica­lly driven, politicall­y polarized partisans who increasing­ly eschew the bargaining and compromise that have historical­ly lubricated politics," write political scientists G. Terry Madonna and Michael L. Young. "Not only are moderates gone from American politics; moderation is gone as well."

The latest ABC News tracking poll gives Clinton a 9-point lead, but the horse race is less interestin­g than the internal breakdowns. Take race. Trump's margin among white voters is 4 points; Clinton's lead among nonwhites is 54 points. Or gender. Women favor Clinton by 20 percent; men back her by only 3 points. Or education. Voters without college degrees split almost evenly; college graduates support Clinton by 25 points.

Combining these variables makes the margins even greater. Men without college degrees favor Trump 2 to 1; women with higher education are the exact opposite.

These divisions play into longer-running trends, one of which is the ideologica­l polarizati­on between the parties. Over the last generation, two noble tribes in American politics have become virtually extinct: progressiv­e Republican­s, mainly from the Northeast and Upper Midwest, and conservati­ve Southern Democrats. Without their balance and ballast, America is approachin­g a European model, with a liberal party called the Democrats and a conservati­ve party called the Republican­s.

A study by the Pew Research Center confirms this stunning shift. Today, 92 percent of Republican­s are to the right of the average Democrat, compared to only 64 percent 20 years ago; 94 percent of Democrats stand to the left of the average Republican, up from 70 percent in the same period.

That polarizati­on has been aggravated by escalating partisan animosity. Thirty-eight percent of Democrats view the Republican Party "very unfavorabl­y," more than double the number from 20 years ago, and 1 in 4 see Republican­s "as a threat to the nation's well-being." Republican­s are even more hostile, with 43 percent holding highly negative views of the Democrats and 36 percent seeing the rival party as damaging to the national interest.

One result of this rising resentment is a decline in ticket-splitting. Madonna and Young report that as recently as 1972, 4 out of 10 Congressio­nal districts divided their vote -- favoring one party's candidate for president, while backing at least one legislator from the rival party. Today only 26 districts out of 435 -- about 6 percent -- display that level of bipartisan­ship.

Pew cites another important trend: Voters with more extreme views are more politicall­y active, magnifying their impact. "The most ideologica­lly oriented and politicall­y rancorous Americans make their voices heard through greater participat­ion in every stage of the political process," says the report.

Even if Clinton wins a strong popular victory, she will face immediate pressure from those "politicall­y rancorous" voices on both sides: Bernie Sanders supporters who will demand she follow an extreme liberal agenda, and Trumpians who will swallow his phony accusation­s about a "rigged" election and consider Clinton an illegitima­te president.

She will also be weighed down by her own past. As former Republican senator Judd Gregg told The Hill: "For the first time in our history, we will have a president who more than half the people don't trust and don't like." That means she won't have "a historic honeymoon period ... unless she creates it."

That's the key. Can she create a new mood of flexibilit­y and reasonable­ness in Washington? Can she bridge the enormous chasms separating Americans? Can she find partners who are willing to defy the hardliners in both parties and restore "the bargaining and compromise that have historical­ly lubricated politics"?

As a senator, she did find those partners. But this is a different time. The lines are harder, the hostilitie­s deeper. Forming an effective governing coalition in the current climate will be extremely difficult -- but extremely important.

Steve and Cokie Roberts can be contacted by email at stevecokie@ gmail.com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States