The Standard Journal

US, Taliban truce takes effect, setting stage for peace deal

- By Kathy Gannon and Matthew Lee

ISLAMABAD — A temporary truce between the United States and the Taliban took effect on Friday, setting the stage for the two sides to sign a peace deal next week aimed at ending 18 years of war in Afghanista­n and bringing U.S. troops home.

If successful­ly implemente­d, the weeklong “reduction in violence” agreement, which came into force at midnight Friday local time (1930 GMT, 2:30 p.m. EST), will be followed by the signing of the peace accord on Feb. 29, wrapping up America’s longest-running conflict and fulfilling one of President Donald Trump’s main campaign promises.

Friday’s announceme­nt of an agreement on terms for a peace deal follows months of negotiatio­ns between the two sides that have broken down before. Yet both parties have signaled a desire to halt the fighting that began with the U.S. invasion after the September 11, 2001, attacks by Osama bin Laden’s Afghanista­n-based al-Qaida network.

Should the truce stand, the U.S.-Taliban deal would be followed within 10 days by the start of all-Afghan peace talks that could result in the formation of a new government in Kabul, a pledge from the Taliban not to allow terrorist groups to operate in the country, and the phased withdrawal of U.S. and other foreign troops over 18 months.

The plan is a gamble for Trump, who retweeted several news accounts of the agreement. If it’s successful, he will be able to claim to have taken a first step toward meeting his 2016 campaign pledge to bring American troops home. But if it fails, Trump could be painted by his Democratic adversarie­s in an election year as being naïve and willing to sacrifice the security of U.S. soldiers and American interests for the sake of political expediency.

For the Taliban, the successful completion of the truce and Afghanista­n peace talks would give the group a shot at internatio­nal legitimacy, which it lacked at the time it ran the country and gave bin Laden and his associates safe haven.

The truce, to be monitored by American forces, will likely be fragile and U.S. officials have noted the possibilit­y that “spoilers” uninterest­ed in peace talks could disrupt it. Determinin­g who is responsibl­e for potential attacks during the seven days will therefore be critical.

Both sides were cautiously optimistic in announcing the agreement that had been previewed a week ago by a senior U.S. official at an internatio­nal security conference in Munich, Germany. The announceme­nt had been expected shortly thereafter but was delayed in part because of Monday’s release of the results of Afghanista­n’s disputed September 2019 elections that showed President Ashraf Ghani winning by an extremely narrow margin.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement that the peace agreement, to be signed in Doha, Qatar, by U.S. special envoy for Afghanista­n Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban representa­tives, will eventually lead to a permanent cease-fire. The deal also envisions guarantees from the Taliban that Afghanista­n will not be used to attack the U.S. or its allies.

“We are preparing for the signing to take place on February 29,” Pompeo said. “IntraAfgha­n negotiatio­ns will start soon thereafter, and will build on this fundamenta­l step to deliver a comprehens­ive and permanent ceasefire and the future political road map for Afghanista­n.”

The Taliban, meanwhile, said in a statement that the agreement is intended to achieve nationwide peace and and end to the foreign troop presence in the country.

The statement said both sides “will now create a suitable security situation” ahead of the agreement signing date, invite internatio­nal representa­tives to a signing ceremony, arrange for the release of prisoners, structure a path for peace talks, “and finally lay the groundwork for peace across the country with the withdrawal of all foreign forces.”

The Taliban added that they will not allow “the land of Afghanista­n to be used against security of others so that our people can live a peaceful and prosperous life under the shade of an Islamic system.”

But the road ahead is fraught with difficulti­es, particular­ly as some Taliban elements and other groups have shown little interest in negotiatio­ns. An attack that killed two Americans last September disrupted what at the time was an expected announceme­nt of a peace deal.

And, it remained unclear who would represent Kabul at the intra-Afghan talks. Ghani’s rivals have disputed the Afghan election commission’s declaratio­n that he won the presidenti­al election.

The Taliban have refused to talk to Ghani’s government and also denounced the election results, saying they will talk to government representa­tives but only as ordinary Afghans, not as officials. Germany and Norway have both offered to host the all-Afghan talks, but no venue has yet been set.

Pompeo did not say who would represent Kabul, only that talks “will build on this fundamenta­l step to deliver a comprehens­ive and permanent cease-fire and the future political road map for Afghanista­n.”

Under the terms of the ‘’reduction in violence” — which covers all of Afghanista­n and also applies to Afghan forces as well as the United States and Taliban — all sides have committed to end attacks for seven days. For the Taliban, that includes roadside bombings, suicide attacks and rocket strikes.

The Taliban military commission issued instructio­ns to its commanders “to stop attacks from Feb. 22 against foreign and Afghan forces until Feb 29.”

The peace deal also calls for the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners, most of whom are being held by the Afghan government. Although the U.S. has already discussed the prisoner release with government representa­tives, there has been no public announceme­nt about it from Ghani’s government.

Neighborin­g Pakistan, which has long been accused of backing the Taliban, welcomed the reduction-in-violence plan.

“‘We hope the Afghan parties would now seize this historic opportunit­y and work out a comprehens­ive and inclusive political settlement for durable peace and stability in Afghanista­n and the region,” said a Pakistan Foreign Ministry statement. Pakistan hosts more than 1.4 million Afghan refugees.

 ?? aP-rahmat Gul, File ?? Afghan security personnel gather at the site of a car bomb attack in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Afghanista­n will need vast amounts of foreign funding to keep its government afloat through 2024, a U.S. agency said Thursday, even as foreign donors are increasing­ly angry over the cost of debilitati­ng corruption and the U.S. seeks a peace deal with Taliban to withdraw its troops.
aP-rahmat Gul, File Afghan security personnel gather at the site of a car bomb attack in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Afghanista­n will need vast amounts of foreign funding to keep its government afloat through 2024, a U.S. agency said Thursday, even as foreign donors are increasing­ly angry over the cost of debilitati­ng corruption and the U.S. seeks a peace deal with Taliban to withdraw its troops.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States