The Sun (Lowell)

Ban Toxic Flame Retardants

- Bob Katzen welcomes feedback at bob@beaconhill­rollcall.com.

On Sept. 19, 2019, the Senate, 38- 0, approved and sent to the House a bill that would ban 11 toxic flame retardants from children’s products, bedding, carpeting and residentia­l upholstere­d furniture sold or manufactur­ed in Massachuse­tts, except for inventory already manufactur­ed prior to Aug. 31, 2020. Another provision requires the Department of Environmen­tal Protection to review, at least every three years, chemical flame retardants used in these type of products and include them on the list of prohibited chemical flame retardants that are documented to pose a health risk. Violators would be fined up to $1,000 for a first offense, and up to $5,000 for a second and subsequent offense.

Motor vehicles, watercraft, aircraft, all-terrain vehicles, offhighway motorcycle­s and electronic devices are exempt from this law as are any previously owned products that contain a retardant.

The House and Senate approved the bill at the end of the 2018 legislativ­e session, but Gov. Charlie Baker did not sign it.

“Massachuse­tts can be a leader in this area, but the specifics of the bill that emerged during the last hours of the legislativ­e session limit its potential effectiven­ess,” Baker wrote to legislator­s. “A deliberati­ve process involving all stakeholde­rs and an implementa­tion schedule that takes into account the realities of manufactur­ing and distributi­on practices are key components to any legislatio­n. I look forward to working with the bill sponsors and stakeholde­rs on a revised form of this legislatio­n in the (2019) session.”

Supporters say that since 1975, manufactur­ers have added chemical flame retardants to a wide array of household items including products with polyuretha­ne foam, such as sofas, car seats, strollers and nap mats. They are also incorporat­ed into electronic products and building insulation.

They argue that the retardants, while well-intentione­d, do more harm than good and have been linked to an increased risk of cancer, fertility problems, neurologic­al disorders and other major health concerns. They note that firefighte­rs are exposed to flame retardants when they go into burning buildings.

“I filed the first bill to ban flame retardants in homes and children’s products many sessions ago,” the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Cynthia Creem, D-newton, told Beacon Hill Roll Call. “And Rep. Marjorie Decker, the lead House sponsor, and I had high hopes at the end of last session, with firefighte­rs and environmen­tal advocates on hand for enactment, only to have the governor refuse to sign this into law. I am anxiously waiting for the House to move forward, and hopeful the governor goes along this time. The science is there on dangerous flame retardants in our homes and delay is only continuing to risk the health of firefighte­rs and children.”

Ryan Trainer, president of the

Internatio­nal Sleep Products Associatio­n, said that banning one specific chemical — antimony trioxide — would limit mattress manufactur­ers’ ability to meet federal flammabili­ty standards. He said that if the bill passed, it could force the redesign of many mattress styles, which would raise prices for consumers and businesses.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States