The Sun (Lowell)

Elite schools must stop accepting Koch climate-change-denier funds

- By Jasmine Banks

Many universiti­es, such as Harvard earlier this year, have earned accolades for divesting their endowments from fossil fuels and promising to fight climate change.

While Duke University has yet to divest, the school’s president, Vincent Price, was recently prompted by activist pressure to acknowledg­e Duke’s responsibi­lity to address climate change.

“We’re going to work to leverage our significan­t research and policy resources toward sustainabl­e environmen­tal solutions,” Price said.

But in February, Duke announced a lecture from author Bjorn Lomborg on his favorite topic: decrying climate change as a hoax.

Why did Duke agree to host this oft-debunked climate denialist? It may be a question of who was paying.

The invitation came from Duke’s “Center for the History of Political Economy.” The center’s lecture series hosting Lomborg, as well as its expanded staff and programmin­g, is funded by a $5 million grant that came from the Charles Koch Foundation.

The Koch foundation is the tool of billionair­e fossil fuel magnate Charles Koch, a wellknown funder of right-wing politics.

Besides Lomborg, the center’s other recent lecture topics have included “Economic Freedom and the Wealth and Health of Nations” and “Free Market Liberalism Is Humane.”

Duke, Harvard and other universiti­es that advocate for climate justice are also still taking money from the climate change-denying Koch network and their right-wing allies. Some have followed their acceptance of these donations with conspicuou­s support for academics or research that support Koch’s political views. To truly live up to their word, these universiti­es need to stop giving academic legitimacy to fossil fuel apologists.

Koch said back in 1974 that “the educationa­l route is both the most vital and the most neglected,” for advancing his radical capitalist philosophy.

One of the network’s primary tools is the funding of campus centers and think tanks, and their efforts are accelerati­ng. Research from my organizati­on, Unkoch My Campus, has revealed that Koch, from 2005 to 2019, donated through his foundation­s more than $458 million to universiti­es and colleges across the country. In 2019 alone, the Charles Koch Foundation donated more than $112 million to 225 distinct campuses and campus-rooted nonprofits.

New research that we supported by Jake Lowe, a student at George Washington University, found that the Koch network has led a surge in funding for GWU’S Regulatory Studies Center — almost $7 million, most of it in the past four years, from just four right-wing funders, including the Koch Foundation and the Exxonmobil Foundation.

In response, the RSC has almost universall­y advocated against government regulation, with 96% of its public comments on federal regulation­s arguing for relaxed standards. The RSC’S leadership has repeatedly questioned the scientific consensus around climate change.

Duke and George Washington are hardly alone.

George Mason University and its right-wing think tank, the Mercatus Center, have long been the Koch network’s top academic recipients.

Charles Koch and his late brother David had “decisionma­king roles” in the center’s academic appointmen­ts through at least 2009, according to a story by The New York Times.

Florida State came under fire in 2014 when it was revealed that the university had accepted millions of dollars from the Koch Foundation in exchange for aligning its curriculum with Koch’s philosophy, giving him a say in which professors were hired.

Tufts University announced plans to divest from fossil fuels but then its Koch-funded study center issued a controvers­ial attack on the state’s efforts to limit carbon emissions.

The money these universiti­es accept from the Koch network is, in some ways, more damaging and insidious than the university’s investment in fossil fuel companies.

Money is fungible, but academic credibilit­y is not.

Jasmine Banks is the executive director of Unkoch My Campus. This column was produced for The Progressiv­e magazine and distribute­d by Tribune News Service.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States