The Sun (Lowell)

White House braces for ruling on abortion pill’s fate

- The Associated Press

WASHINGTON >> The Biden administra­tion is preparing for a worst-case scenario if a conservati­ve federal judge rules in favor of a lawsuit seeking to restrict access to one of the two drugs typically used to induce a medicated abortion.

Two drugs, mifepristo­ne and misoprosto­l, can be taken by women at home and are used for just over half of U.S. abortions. But that could be quickly changed by a lawsuit filed by an anti-abortion group in Texas that claims the Food and Drug Administra­tion wrongly approved mifepristo­ne for use more than 23 years ago.

The case is before a federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump. A ruling in favor of the abortion opponents could immediatel­y shut down the sale of the drug, but women would still have access to medicated abortions with a regimen of misoprosto­l.

Vice President Kamala Harris promised on Friday that the White House would push back on efforts to ban the drug, as she gathered a group of nearly a dozen doctors and abortion rights advocates to discuss a plan for responding to the looming threat to access to medical abortions.

“There are now partisan and political attacks attempting to question the legitimacy of a group of scientists and doctors who have studied the significan­ce of this drug,” Harris said. “There is now an attempt by politician­s to remove it from the ability of doctors to prescribe and the ability of people to receive.”

The lawsuit against mifepristo­ne was filed by the Alliance for Defending Freedom, which was also involved in the Mississipp­i case that led to Roe v. Wade being overturned. It’s the latest fallout in the struggle over reproducti­ve care that the Democratic administra­tion must grapple with since the Supreme Court overturned the constituti­onal right to an abortion last year.

Harris did not publicly lay out how the administra­tion plans to respond if a ruling that halts the sale of the drug nationwide comes down on Friday.

Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, meanwhile, was in California on Friday to meet leaders from Planned Parenthood to talk about access to the abortion drugs.

Dr. Kristyn Brandi said she told the vice president Friday that the ruling could trigger widespread confusion over the accessibil­ity of medicated abortion in the U.S. Brandi, who is chair of the Physicians for Reproducti­ve Health, said she already fields calls at her New Jersey clinic from women asking if medicated abortion is legal in the state.

“It’s a really important thing to communicat­e with people: medication abortion is not going away,” Brandi said.

She added that Harris expressed support for immediatel­y challengin­g the ruling if it shuts down access to mifepristo­ne.

Clinics and telehealth providers have been preparing for a ruling that shuts down access to mifepristo­ne, ordering more doses of misoprosto­l so they can offer medication abortions with just that one drug. They will have to change the way they counsel patients, telling them that misoprosto­l-only abortions are slightly less effective and sometimes more painful than abortions done with both drugs.

Abortions using both drugs “can be as effective as 98% or more,” while misoprosto­l-only abortions are up to about 95% effective, Melissa Grant, chief operating officer of the Carafem abortion clinic, told The Associated Press.

Mifepristo­ne dilates the cervix and blocks the action of the hormone progestero­ne, which enables a pregnancy to continue. Misoprosto­l causes contractio­ns that empty the uterus. Typically, mifepristo­ne is taken by mouth first, followed by misoprosto­l a day or two later.

Studies show medication abortions are safe and effective, though with a slightly lower success rate than ones done by procedure in a clinic.

With the Texas decision pending, a dozen Democratic-controlled states filed their own lawsuit in federal court against the FDA on Thursday in Washington. The lawsuit seeks to make it easier for woman to access the drug and alleges that several FDA requiremen­ts for prescribin­g and dispensing it are “burdensome, harmful and unnecessar­y.”

When the FDA approved mifepristo­ne in 2000 it placed several safety restrictio­ns on its use, including limiting dispensing to specialty clinics and requiring women to pick up the drug in person. The Biden administra­tion had sought to expand access to medicated abortions in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, with an FDA announceme­nt this year that broadened the pill’s access through retail and mail-order pharmacies.

But several limitation­s remain, such as one that doctors must be specially certified to prescribe the drug.

Several medical groups have long opposed those requiremen­ts, pointing to the low rate of side effects seen with mifepristo­ne compared with other medication­s that don’t carry any certificat­ion requiremen­ts.

 ?? AP PHOTO/JUSTIN REX ?? People gather in front of the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United States Courthouse to protest a lawsuit to ban the abortion drug mifepristo­ne Saturday, Feb. 11, 2023, in Amarillo, Texas.
AP PHOTO/JUSTIN REX People gather in front of the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United States Courthouse to protest a lawsuit to ban the abortion drug mifepristo­ne Saturday, Feb. 11, 2023, in Amarillo, Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States