The Sun (San Bernardino)

GOP blames abortion confusion on doctors, bad info

- By Kimberlee Kruesi

NASHVILLE, TENN. >> In Republican­led states across the U.S., conservati­ve legislator­s are refusing to reevaluate abortion bans, even as doctors and patients insist the laws’ exceptions are dangerousl­y unclear, resulting in denied treatment to some pregnant women in need.

Instead, GOP leaders accuse abortion rights advocates of deliberate­ly spreading misinforma­tion and doctors of intentiona­lly denying services in an effort to undercut the bans and make a political point. At the same time, however, some states are taking steps that they say will provide more clarity about when abortions can be legally performed.

The Republican-controlled South Dakota Legislatur­e wants to create a video in which medical experts — and the state’s attorneys — would explain to doctors and patients when abortions can be legally performed. The measure was passed last month and is now awaiting the signature of Republican Gov. Kristi Noem, who has indicated she will sign it.

The first-in-the-nation idea is wholeheart­edly supported by SBA Pro-Life, one of the country’s largest anti-abortion groups, which says the video will help to combat “confusion caused by the abortion industry.”

“South Dakota is showing the rest of the nation how to protect women’s lives from the misinforma­tion surroundin­g abortion laws,” said the organizati­on’s public affairs director in South Dakota, Kelsey Pritchard.

Oklahoma and Kentucky are also taking steps to clarify their abortion bans, though in both states the attorneys general, not physicians, are the ones dictating the terms.

In Oklahoma, the AG sent out a memo in 2022 informing prosecutor­s and police that doctors should have “substantia­l leeway” to provide certain abortions.

Last year, the office added that patients don’t have to be “septic, bleeding profusely, or otherwise close to death” — but reiterated a past warning that doctors should be prosecuted if there’s evidence they violated the law by providing an abortion when a woman’s life wasn’t actually in danger.

Kentucky’s attorney general has stated that miscarriag­es and ectopic pregnancie­s — when a fertilized egg grows outside the uterus — are both exempted from the state’s abortion ban, but has been silent on the majority of other pregnancy complicati­ons that physicians and patients have pointed out.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constituti­onal right to abortion in 2022, states have been free to enact their own restrictio­ns. South Dakota is among the 14 that ban abortion at all stages of pregnancy. The law does allow an abortion exception to save the life of the mother, but like similar statutes in other states, it does not clearly define which pregnancy complicati­ons are considered life-threatenin­g.

“It’s not going to deal with hard calls,” said Greer Donley, an associate professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law who is an expert on abortion law. “They actually don’t want to deal with the hard calls because their movement is not sure ... how those hard calls should be resolved.”

As some states mull how to clarify — without weakening — their abortion bans, abortion rights advocates in several states continue to challenge the bans with lawsuits.

Twenty Texas women denied abortions are suing the state seeking clarificat­ion, while advocates filed a lawsuit in Tennessee arguing that the state ban’s vaguely defined exceptions put pregnant women’s lives at risk.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti pushed back. He argued that it wasn’t the law, per se, that is harming women but rather “other factors like doctors’ independen­t choices not to provide permissibl­e abortions.”

The lawsuit is ongoing, with attorneys expected to make their arguments before a three-judge panel next month on whether the state ban should be temporaril­y blocked as the legal battle continues or if the case should be dismissed entirely.

Donley spurned the idea that doctors bear the responsibi­lity for endangerin­g patients.

In Texas, a pregnant woman whose fetus had a fatal condition went straight to the state supreme court last year to request an exemption from the Lone Star State’s strict ban. The court denied Katie Cox’s request — forcing her to go out of state to get an abortion — but did urge the Texas Medical Board to issue guidance to doctors on how to interpret the law.

And yet, the medical board, comprising 19 members appointed by the governor, has so far not offered any sort of guidance.

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is a vocal abortion opponent.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States