The Sunnyvale Sun

San Jose City Council adopts new political boundaries

- By Maggie Angst mangst@ bayareanew­sgroup.com

After a lengthy process that many city leaders and community members described as “messy,” “painful” and “frustratin­g,” San Jose’s political boundaries officially are moving.

The San Jose City Council finalized a new map Dec. 15 to redraw the city’s district boundaries as required every 10 years after the U.S. census to reflect population shifts.

The decision came after a final discussion that lasted nearly six hours, stretched across two days and attempted to quell concerns raised about potential voter suppressio­n and legal infraction­s.

“The redistrict­ing process has been unnecessar­ily messy, starting with the fact that the council was given three different maps to choose from,” Mayor Sam Liccardo said in an interview after the meeting. “… But at the end of the day, we have a map that addresses population changes, complies with federal law and fairly responds to the needs of our diverse community.”

The adopted map initially was submitted by Council member David Cohen last week and tweaked following input received from residents and other members of the council. The map, referred to as the Council Map, was chosen among a total of five options — three advanced by the city’s 11-member Redistrict­ing Commission after months of deliberati­on and community meetings and two late additions drawn by Council member Magdalena Carrasco and Cohen.

From the onset, two maps proposed by community members and advocacy groups — referred to as the Unity Map and Community Map — sparked heated debates and polarizing views among residents who clashed over keeping as many of the current boundaries in place and reversing the status quo to give more voting power to renters and people of color. Cohen said his map was intended to find a middle ground between the two by reuniting communitie­s in Willow Glen and downtown while ensuring the voices of voters of color and renters also were lifted.

“We always want to default to what we know and what we’re comfortabl­e with as far as district lines,” Cohen said during the meeting Dec. 15. “… But if every cycle we say our goal is to keep the lines where they are in all boundaries, we are not using this opportunit­y to do what may be better for the residents of this city.”

Under the new map, Districts 2, 3, 6 and 10 will experience the biggest changes to their boundaries. A northeast chunk of District 10 will be moved into District 2, and most neighborho­ods between Highway 85 and Santa Teresa County Park will be shifted from District 2 into District 10.

Council member Sergio Jimenez, who represents District 2, said the shift “better aligns some of the respective communitie­s of interest.” He noted that renters in the current northeaste­rn neighborho­ods of District 10 share the same interests with residents in the northern portion of his district in terms of transit, affordable housing and tenant protection­s. Meanwhile, residents along the Santa Teresa Foothills, who now will be moved into District 2, share much of the same interests of residents in District 10’s Almaden Valley pertaining to protecting open space, limiting density and preserving single-family neighborho­ods, Jimenez said.

Although Council member Matt Mahan, who represents District 10, initially was opposed to the shift, he noted the need to increase the population of District 10 and to dispel accusation­s made by the public that he was trying to suppress the vote of minorities and renters within the city by sticking closer to the current boundary lines.

“I think if you’ve been following the process, the very reasonable questions that I’ve raised about swapping 60,000 people between District 10 and District 2 is a rational conversati­on we can have,” he said during the meeting. “.. But let’s move on with a rational honest conversati­on that doesn’t accuse people of something incredibly serious and ethically and legally wrong, which is voter suppressio­n.”

San Jose census data shows that the city’s population grew by about 67,000 residents in the past decade, increasing from nearly 946,000 residents to 1,013,000. Districts 3 and 4, which encompass the city’s downtown area and North San Jose, are the most heavily populated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States