The Taos News

Amendment changes the commission that oversees utility rates

Arguments pro and con

- Provided by LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Los Alamos County

The Public Regulation Commission oversees utility rates, pipeline safety, transporta­tion issues and the state fire marshal’s office. Currently, the PRC consists of five elected members, each representi­ng different areas of the state. This amendment would reduce the number of commission­ers to three and all would be appointed by the governor instead of elected by voters.

Summary: Constituti­onal Amendment 1 would amend Article 11, Section 1 of the Constituti­on of New Mexico to reduce the number of Public Regulation Commission members to three, with no more than two members from the same political party. Members would no longer be elected, but instead would be appointed for six-year terms by the governor, with the consent of the senate, from a list of nominees submitted to the governor through a newly establishe­d Public Regulation Commission Nominating Committee.

Constituti­onal Amendment 1 would also narrow the scope of the PRC’s constituti­onally granted regulatory powers to public utilities, while still allowing the legislatur­e to assign responsibi­lity for the regulation of other public service companies to the commission by law. Arguments For

1 By insulating the commission from electoral politics, the commission­ers may be better able to carry out their duties in an unbiased fashion. They could also focus on the interests of the ratepayers throughout the state rather than individual districts.

2 It would provide for increased vetting of commission­ers and better ensure that well-qualified individual­s serve on the PRC. New Mexico would join the vast majority of states that regulate utilities through governor-appointed commission­s.

3 The PRC is a quasi-judicial body. Improved screening and qualificat­ion requiremen­ts would help ensure that commission­ers possess the experience and training necessary to make decisions within the complex legal framework that governs public utility regulation.

Arguments Against

1 It does not change how the PRC actually functions. The amendment leaves it up to the Legislatur­e to provide for how commission­ers will be evaluated and what qualificat­ions commission­ers will be required to have.

2 It removes the voters’ ability to hold commission­ers accountabl­e for their actions. Electing commission­ers from their respective districts allows the public more direct oversight of commission­ers and their decisions.

3 The process to remove a commission­er would be more involved and take more time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States