The Times Herald (Norristown, PA)

Money

-

strong state oversight and a good asset-allocation approach for the popular age-based portfolios. These portfolios invest more aggressive­ly when beneficiar­ies are younger, increasing­ly moving to more conservati­ve options as the child gets closer to attending college.

Morningsta­r gave only four plans its highest rating (gold): Illinois’ Bright Start College Savings, Virginia’s Invest 529, Nevada’s Vanguard 529 College Savings and Utah’s Educationa­l Savings Plan.

Nine plans in these states received a silver ranking: Illinois, Ohio, Virginia, Alabama, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, California and Alaska. Eighteen plans got a bronze rating.

Twenty-six plans earned a neutral designatio­n, which means they had room for improvemen­t. But neutral doesn’t necessaril­y mean stay away.

“Some neutral-rated programs may hold appeal for in-state residents because of meaningful added benefits, such as local tax breaks,” Morningsta­r said.

The five plans at the bottom of the list mostly got the lowest rating because they haven’t followed the trend of reducing fees. The state plans with the lowest ratings are: North Dakota’s College SAVE, Florida’s 529 Savings Plan, New Jersey’s Franklin Templeton 529 College Savings, Arkansas’ GIFT College Investing Plan and Nebraska’s TD Ameritrade 529 College Savings.

As an industry, many plans are lowering costs, and those that don’t are increasing­ly unattracti­ve as an investment option, said Leo Acheson, associate director of Morningsta­r’s multi-asset and alternativ­e strategies team.

The Arkansas and North Dakota plans were both given an “F” because of excessivel­y high fees, even though they offered Vanguard’s typically lowcost index funds, Acheson told me. In this area, the plans aren’t keeping up with their peers.

“Prices depend somewhat on scale, or assets across the plan, and Arkansas and North Dakota are relatively small and therefore charge high program-management fees that erode Vanguard’s usual edge in price,” according to the Morningsta­r report by Acheson and associate analyst Stefan Sayre. “There’s little incentive for even instate college savers to stay in the plans when similar fare is offered at a much more palatable price.”

As with any investment, it’s important to pay attention to costs. Fees matter because they reduce your return. For directsold plans, age-based portfolios that use active investment management on average charge about 0.80 percent, Acheson said. But direct-sold plans utilizing low-cost index strategies would cost on average roughly 0.25 percent. Compare this with a plan sold through a financial adviser, where average fees for active age-based portfolios are about 1 percent.

“Hopefully the adviser would be adding value either through making certain recommenda­tions within the plan or by encouragin­g greater savings,” Acheson said. “The adviser-sold plans do cost more.”

Another key factor Morningsta­r looks at is whether a state plan has strong oversight. Analysts look for states that stay on top of industry best practices or keep assessing the cost of their 529 plans. Some states take a handsoff approach and aren’t as attentive to how plans are run, Acheson said.

You can find the full list of the rankings at Morningsta­r.com.

Choosing a 529 plan can be overwhelmi­ng, so use these news ratings to help find the best fit for you and your student. Readers can write to Michelle Singletary c/o The Washington Post, 1301 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071. Her email address is michelle.singletary@ washpost.com. Follow her on Twitter (@Singletary­M) or Facebook (www.facebook. com/MichelleSi­ngletary). Comments and questions are welcome, but due to the volume of mail, personal responses may not be possible. Please also note comments or questions may be used in a future column, with the writer’s name, unless a specific request to do otherwise is indicated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States