With money goals, multitasking pays off

NEW YORK >> Tackling money goals one at a time cost financial literacy expert Barbara O’Neill at least $1 million.

That’s how much O’Neill, a distinguished professor at Rutgers University, figures she lost by starting saving for retirement only after she had created an emergency fund, bought a car with cash and purchased a home.

“I tell students that eventually, 30 years later, I hit the million-dollar mark, but I could’ve had $2 million,” O’Neill says.

Too often, financial experts say, people want to attack their money goals one at a time: “As soon as I pay off my credit card debt, then I’ll start saving for a home,” or, “As soon as I pay off my student loan debt, then I’ll start saving for retirement.”

These folks don’t realize how costly the words “as soon as” can be. Paying off debt is a worthy goal, but it shouldn’t come at the expense of other goals, particularly saving for retirement. Company matches and tax breaks are not retroactive. And the sooner money is contributed, the longer it can benefit from compounded returns. Compounded returns are when your investment gains earn their own gains, which can dramatically increase your balances over time.

“By putting off saving for the future, you are really inhibiting yourself from benefiting from that wonderful magic,” says Kimberly Zimmerman Rand , an accredited financial counselor and principal at Dragonfly Financial Solutions in Boston. “If you can start saving today ... you are going to have a lot more five years from now than if you decide to pay off debt for three years and start saving in year four.”

Why people tackle one goal at a time

The desire to laser-focus on one goal at a time is understandable, says financial coach Linda Matthew . People see faster results if they put every spare dollar toward paying down debt, for example.

WESTON >> PAGE 2

Nerd Wallet