The Times Herald (Norristown, PA)

Faster results

- By Matthew Perrone

WASHINGTON » Home testing for the new coronaviru­s may sound like a good idea, but U.S. regulators say it’s still too risky.

They’ve stopped companies that quickly launched home-testing kits until they can show their products can accurately detect the virus.

For now, the only way Americans can get tested is at hospitals, clinics or drive-thru sites, with a doctor’s order.

After a botched rollout, testing in the U.S. has ramped up thanks to highvolume testing machines and new rapid tests. Last week, federal officials said total tests topped 1.4 million, and labs are processing nearly 100,000 tests daily. That’s the threshold many experts say is needed to track the virus.

Still, testing continues to be constraine­d by shortages of medical supplies like gloves, masks and swabs. And the widespread drivethru testing proposed for parking lots at chains like Walmart, Walgreens and Target has barely gotten off the ground.

Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administra­tion is aggressive­ly pushing new options onto the market.

Genetic tests are the gold standard for detecting COVID-19 infections. New, quicker ones are replacing the original laboratory tests that have to be manually mixed and developed.

The idea behind both tests is the same: chemical solutions are used to isolate the virus from the patient sample, grab its genetic material and then reproduce it millions of times until it’s detectable with a computer.

New rapid tests such as the one by Abbott Laboratori­es automate the process, cutting the time from four to six hours to about 15 minutes.

“Essentiall­y all of the reactions are squeezed into a little cartridge, so it’s a very nice, self-contained system.” said Dr. Bobbi Pritt, lab director at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota

The cartridges from Abbott and other companies run on small, portable electronic machines found in thousands of U.S. hospitals, clinics and doctor’s offices. That’s expected to increase testing beyond large universiti­es, government and commercial labs. Abbott said it plans to begin shipping 50,000 tests per day this month. U.S. officials said they’d go first to remote areas with less access to labs.

For now, only a health care profession­al can order a coronaviru­s test. Under current guidelines, priority is given to people with COVID-19 symptoms who fall into several high-risk groups, including hospitaliz­ed patients, health care workers and the elderly.

“If you’re not sick, you don’t need to be tested” has been the mantra for weeks.

Don’t try this at home

Accurately testing for coronaviru­s involves several steps, including carefully swabbing the nose or throat to collect a sample, placing it in a sterile tube, storing it below 46 degrees Fahrenheit and then shipping it to a lab within three days.

Health officials warn a number of things could go wrong if consumers try to swab, store and ship their own samples, potentiall­y resulting in testing errors and undetected infections.

The FDA is talking to companies working on at-home kits, but they’ll be required to show that their results are comparable to those of people under profession­al care, agency spokesman Jeremy Kahn said in a statement.

Many of the proposed athome tests aren’t like home pregnancy tests — they won’t provide instant results. The samples still need to go to a lab.

After several companies began shipping test kits last month, the FDA quickly intervened. No home tests have been approved, and the products sent to U.S. consumers were frauds, regulators said.

Several companies were caught off guard including San Francisco startup Nurx, which initially built its business around prescribin­g birth control drugs via brief online consultati­ons.

On March 20, the company announced plans to ship 10,000 testing kits to

 ?? DAVID ZALUBOWSKI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Medical technician­s handle a vial containing a nasal swab at a drive-thru testing site in Wheat Ridge, Colo. Home testing for coronaviru­s may sound like a good idea, but U.S. regulators say it’s still too risky.
DAVID ZALUBOWSKI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Medical technician­s handle a vial containing a nasal swab at a drive-thru testing site in Wheat Ridge, Colo. Home testing for coronaviru­s may sound like a good idea, but U.S. regulators say it’s still too risky.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States