The Times Herald (Norristown, PA)

Abortion foes vent after Supreme Court ruling

- By Elana Schor

NEW YORK » Abortion opponents vented their disappoint­ment and fury on Monday after the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision to strike down a Louisiana law that would have curbed abortion access.

The ruling delivered a defeat to anti-abortion activists but could intensify interest in the November election among religious conservati­ves who are a key part of Trump’s base. Some top religious conservati­ve backers of President Donald Trump noted pointedly that both justices he named to the high court dissented from Monday’s decision, portraying it as an argument to ensure Trump has another term in office to potentiall­y tap more conservati­ve nominees.

The Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life and a member of Trump’s Catholic voter outreach effort, said the president’s “two appointees voted the right way” in supporting Louisiana’s ability to require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.

“Once again this ruling underscore­s the importance of elections,” Pavone said in a statement. “We need a solid pro-life majority on the Supreme Court to uphold the rights of women and the unborn.”

Johnnie Moore, an evangelica­l adviser to the Trump administra­tion, said the decision could help motivate anti-abortion activists to vote to reelect the president to give him a third chance to put a nominee on the Supreme Court.

“Conservati­ves know they are on the one-yardline,” Moore tweeted. “Enthusiasm is already unpreceden­ted, evangelica­l turnout will be too.”

The Trump campaign also invoked the decision to appeal to voters in a statement from deputy communicat­ions director Ali Pardo.

“This case underscore­s the importance of re-electing President Trump, who has a record of appointing conservati­ve judges, rather than Joe Biden, who will appoint radical, activist judges who will legislate from the courts,” Pardo said.

Some right-leaning abortion foes — including at least three congressio­nal Republican­s — responded to the decision by criticizin­g Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by President George W. Bush. Roberts concurred with the court’s four more liberal justices while not signing onto their opinion in the case.

“Chief Justice Roberts is at it again with his political gamesmansh­ip,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tweeted. “This time he has sided with abortion extremists who care more about providing abortion-on-demand than protecting women’s health.”

“Americans hoping for justice for women and unborn babies were let down again today by John Roberts,” Sen. Tom Cotton, RArk., said in a statement.

“What’s next, Chief Justice Roberts? Our Second Amendment rights?” Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, tweeted.

Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley, a former Roberts clerk, tweeted that the decision was a “disaster” and “a big-time wake up call to religious conservati­ves,” whom he urged to “make our voices heard.”

But Roberts’ move to stand apart from his more liberal colleagues, contextual­izing his vote as one to protect the court’s past precedent, left other religious conservati­ves vowing to rededicate themselves to their fight to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that establishe­d abortion rights.

“This case was about whether the state has the right to ensure that abortionis­ts who take women’s money also provide for their safety,” Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, a prominent pro-Trump evangelica­l ally, said in a statement, adding that “I do look forward to the day when the Supreme Court will correct the gross injustice of the Roe v. Wade decision that has led to the killing of tens of millions of unborn babies.”

Russell Moore, president of the public policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, defended Louisiana’s abortion law as “placing the most minimal restrictio­ns possible on an abortion industry that insists on laissez-faire for itself and its profits.”

“Nonetheles­s, we will continue to seek an America where vulnerable persons, including unborn children and their mothers, are seen as precious, not disposable,” said Moore, who leads the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.

The chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee for Pro-Life Activities, Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City in Kansas, said in a statement that Catholics would “grieve this decision” but would “continue to pray and fight for justice for mothers and children.”

“We will not rest until the day when the Supreme Court corrects the grave injustice of Roe ... and recognizes the Constituti­onal right to life for unborn human beings,” Naumann said.

 ?? PATRICK SEMANSKY — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Anti-abortion protesters wait outside the Supreme Court for a decision, Monday, June 29, 2020 in Washington on the Louisiana case, Russo v. June Medical Services LLC.
PATRICK SEMANSKY — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Anti-abortion protesters wait outside the Supreme Court for a decision, Monday, June 29, 2020 in Washington on the Louisiana case, Russo v. June Medical Services LLC.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States