The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

Ban transgende­r soldiers? Why not just stop covering Viagra?

Now the creeping bigotry of the Trump administra­tion blossoms into action.

- — San Jose Mercury News, Digital First Media

First target: transgende­r soldiers.

Who’s next? President Trump announced Wednesday morning that transgende­r people would be banned from serving in the military in any capacity, citing — in a tweet, of course — “tremendous” medical costs.

According to an analysis by the Military Times, the military spends 10 times as much on erectile dysfunctio­n medicines (read: Viagra) — $84 million annually — as it does on yearly transition-related medical care for active-duty transgende­r service members.

Today there are an estimated 1,320 to 6,630 transgende­r active-duty members and another 1,500 in the reserves, where medical benefits are more limited. At a time when recruiting is not exactly easy, can the nation really afford to toss those people away?

But this isn’t about money. It’s about Trump and some military leaders buying into prejudice and fears of people who are not precisely like them. Profession­alism, hard work and just getting the job done do not matter.

A retired Navy Seal of 20 years, speaking with Business Insider on Wednesday, took on the president.

“Let’s meet face to face and you tell me I’m not worthy,” Kristin Beck said. “Transgende­r doesn’t matter. Do your service.”

Beck was deployed 13 times, serving in Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanista­n, according to Business Insider. She scoffed at the thought that other service members’ discomfort at working with transgende­r colleagues would interfere with service.

“A very profession­al unit with great leadership wouldn’t have a problem,” Beck said.

It’s all in the leadership. And leadership starts at the top.

Transgende­r soldiers risking their lives for all of us are not the issue. President Trump is.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States