The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

Trump EPA moves to roll back more clean air and water rules

- By Michael Biesecker and Matthew Brown

WASHINGTON » The Trump administra­tion said Thursday it is rewriting Obama-era rules governing pollution from oil and gas operations and coal ash dumps, moves that opponents say will significan­tly weaken protection­s for human health and the environmen­t.

The changes proposed by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency are the latest in series of actions taken over the last year to roll back regulation­s opposed by the fossil-fuel industry. The agency said the revisions would save electric utilities $100 million per year in compliance costs, while oil and gas operators would reap up to $16 million in benefits by 2035.

Environmen­tal advocates predicted the revisions would lead to dirtier air and water.

The 2016 standards governing leaks and emissions from oil and gas drilling operations sought to reduce the amounts of methane and volatile organic compounds, or VOCs. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere, contributi­ng to climate change. VOCs are a component of ground-level ozone, air pollution that can aggravate asthma and contribute to early deaths from respirator­y disease.

In a statement, EPA Assistant Administra­tor for Air and Radiation Bill Wehrum said the changes will “provide regulatory certainty to one of the largest sectors of the American economy and avoid unnecessar­y compliance costs to both covered entities and the states.”

Prior to joining the Trump administra­tion in November, Wehrum worked as a lawyer representi­ng fossil fuel and chemical companies regulated by the EPA office he now leads.

Environmen­tal groups said the Trump rollbacks would let large-scale polluters off the hook.

“This move would put an estimated 25 million people who live in counties with dangerousl­y unhealthy air at even greater risk from oil and gas related air pollution by rolling back measures that are flexible, cost-effective and that have been proven to work by leading states and responsibl­e companies,” said Matt Watson, a spokesman for the Environmen­tal Defense Fund.

The EPA also proposed amending rules to give state regulators more authority over how utilities dispose of the ash left behind when coal is burned to generate electricit­y. The gray ash, typically dumped near coal-fired power plants in unlined pits, contains toxic heavy metals such as lead and arsenic that over time can leach into groundwate­r or nearby rivers, potentiall­y contaminat­ing sources of drinking water.

“Today’s coal ash proposal embodies EPA’s commitment to our state partners by providing them with the ability to incorporat­e flexibilit­ies into their coal ash permit programs based on the needs of their states,” EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt said.

The announceme­nt came on the eve of a deadline for utilities to release reports documentin­g coal ash contaminat­ion of water supplies at hundreds of power plants across the United States. The pollution reports were intended as a first step toward cleaning up the contaminat­ion leaking from the ash pits.

EPA said it will be taking comment on whether future deadlines for ash pollution cleanup efforts will remain in place or be pushed back. Agency representa­tives did not immediatel­y respond to questions about whether Friday’s deadline still stands.

A spokeswoma­n for American Electric Power said the company still intends to post its pollution reports even as it begins reviewing the proposed changes. The Ohio-based utility has 14 coal plants in eight states that are covered by EPA’s coal ash rule.

“We support EPA’s efforts to partner with the states,” AEP spokeswoma­n Melissa McHenry said. “We are complying with the existing federal rules, but have worked closely with our states at many sites regulated under the (coal ash disposal program) for years.”

Frank Holleman, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmen­tal Law Center who has spent years pressing utilities to clean up coal ash, said the changes would hand over too much responsibi­lity to state officials often too deferentia­l to lobbyists from big utilities.

“Instead of protecting American communitie­s and rivers from coal ash, EPA is trying to bail out utilities polluting our waterways and drinking water supplies,” he said. “These proposals will weaken rules that protect our groundwate­r from arsenic and mercury, and continue to extend the use of unlined, leaking coal ash pits next to our waterways. America’s families and clean water deserve better.”

Brown reported from Billings, Montana. Associated Press reporter Sarah Rankin contribute­d from Richmond, Virginia.

Follow Biesecker at http://www.twitter.com/mbieseck

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States