The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

Military child abuse case raises complex sentencing issues

- By David Porter

NEWARK » The allegation­s were shocking: an Army major and his wife accused of abusing their three young foster children through beatings, denial of food and water and forcing them to eat hot pepper flakes as punishment.

When John and Carolyn Jackson were convicted of child endangerme­nt in 2015, prosecutor­s received another shock when the trial judge, casting aside their recommenda­tion for prison terms of more than 15 years, sentenced Carolyn Jackson to two years and John Jackson to probation.

A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that a U.S. district judge’s sentencing was “substantiv­ely unreasonab­le” and that her rationale “defied common sense,” and sent the case back for resentenci­ng, scheduled for this week.

Judges often say that imposing sentence is the most difficult part of their job, and the Jackson case amplifies the balancing act necessary to weigh the seriousnes­s of the crime with the requiremen­ts of the law.

“This case is full of emotion and horror, but there’s a process and a way to get to a reasonable sentence,” said Rebecca Monck Ricigliano, a former federal prosecutor currently in private practice with Crowell and Moring in New York. “There is a method here, and I think that’s where the circuit court found fault.”

The Jacksons’ first trial in 2014 ended when a prosecutor inadverten­tly referred to a fourth foster child who had died. The Jacksons weren’t charged in his death, and Hayden declared a mistrial.

At the retrial, prosecutor­s presented evidence the children suffered broken bones and other serious health problems from the abuse, and were severely underweigh­t and developmen­tally delayed when they were removed from the family home in 2010.

The couple’s attorneys argued the Jacksons’ childreari­ng methods might have been unconventi­onal but weren’t criminal. They also said the foster children had serious health problems before they joined the family.

Since the Jacksons lived at the Army’s Picatinny Arsenal facility in New Jersey, they were tried in federal court. Because child endangerme­nt isn’t a federal crime, state endangerme­nt charges were merged into the federal indictment to go along with a conspiracy count and two assault counts.

When the Jacksons were convicted of child endangerme­nt but acquitted of the assault counts, prosecutor­s argued Hayden should sentence them under federal guidelines because the nature of the endangerme­nt counts made them “sufficient­ly analogous” to assault.

Defense attorneys disagreed and argued the couple “can’t be tried for one crime and sentenced for another.”

During a lengthy sentencing hearing, Hayden rejected the prosecutio­n’s argument, saying that applying federal assault guidelines was the equivalent of “fitting a square peg into a round hole.” She also accused prosecutor­s of being overzealou­s.

“This is not a game,” she said. “This is not the Giants versus Miami. This is not, how many touchdowns do we win by?”

The appeals court called that comment “inappropri­ate” and faulted Hayden for not considerin­g aggravatin­g factors such as the extent of the children’s injuries.

“Characteri­zing Defendants’ conduct as misguided corporal punishment and mistaken or bad parenting, the District Court refused to hold Defendants’ responsibl­e for the children’s various injuries and medical conditions,” the majority wrote.

Highlighti­ng the case’s complexiti­es, 3rd Circuit Judge Theodore McKee wrote in a dissent that he agreed with Hayden’s reasoning even though “it is impossible for anyone with an ounce of compassion to read through this transcript without becoming extraordin­arily moved by allegation­s about what these children had to endure.”

The U.S. attorney’s office and an attorney representi­ng Carolyn Jackson declined to comment on Wednesday’s resentenci­ng. John Jackson is represente­d by the federal public defender’s office, which doesn’t comment on cases.

The case is an example of the judicial system working as it should, said Michael Weinstein, a former government prosecutor now in private practice with New York-based Cole Schotz.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States