The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

If Google Assistant calls, think about hanging up

-

Do we really say “um,” “mmhmm” and “gotcha” all the time?

Yes, we do, if by “we” we mean American human beings c. 2018.

Does that mean our robots should say the same words as they do tasks for us and try to act all homo sapien?

That’s the somewhat profound question raised last week when Google CEO Sundar Pichai unveiled the tech giant’s Google Assistant device, set to provide competitio­n for the already-automatons of Apple’s Siri and Amazon’s Alexa.

“What you’re going to hear is the Google Assistant actually calling a real salon to schedule an appointmen­t for you,” Pichai told the audience. “Let’s listen.”

When we do, we hear, in a mellifluou­s all-American assistant’s happy voice: “Hi, I am calling to book a woman’s haircut for a client — umm, I’m looking for something on May 3.” “Sure, give me one second,” says the (presumably flesh-andblood) scheduler on the line.

And then, the first big laugh line for the live audience gathered for the droid-vocal unveiling: “Mm-hmm,” the bot says, with seemingly slavish contentmen­t at the pleasure of being allowed to wait. It’s a drag, but she’s going to remain perky.

A time for the clip job is worked out, to much applause.

But isn’t there something about this interactio­n that should give us pause? (The first thing is that there are already signs the interactio­n was rigged, or at least edited. Google won’t comment on that.) The voice of the GA is pretty convincing­ly human, much more so than what’s been heard from Siri and Alexa. If this was a partially cooked call, the technology is apparently real.

But the assistant making the call is not. She is artificial intelligen­ce. Just as how, in the online-graphics world, new hyper-Photoshopp­ing techniques can convincing­ly place one person’s face on another’s body in video, so that many pieces of photograph­ic “evidence” will automatica­lly become suspect, we now have aural impersonat­ions that are very convincing indeed.

While Google says it intends to place a warning up-front so that it’s clear one is being called by a machine, it certainly didn’t during the demonstrat­ion.

The late Stephen Hawking once said that artificial general intelligen­ce “could spell the end of the human race.”

Is that a good trade for not having to telephone for your next haircut?

— Los Angeles Daily News,

Digital First Media

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States