The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

What’s next in the impeachmen­t inquiry as Congress returns

- By Mary Clare Jalonick and Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON >> Congress is returning from a twoweek recess on Tuesday, but some lawmakers barely left Washington.

Three House committees investigat­ing impeachmen­t worked through the break, issuing multiple subpoenas and holding deposition­s with State Department officials relevant to the inquiry . Democrats are investigat­ing President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine and exploring whether he abused his office by seeking dirt from a foreign country on former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading Democratic contender for the 2020 White House nomination and Trump’s political rival.

That work will intensify when Congress gets back. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., has said she wants the committees to work “expeditiou­sly” as Democrats gather evidence and prepare to make a final decision on whether to vote to impeach the president.

The impeachmen­t probe was sparked by a whistleblo­wer who revealed that Trump asked Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, on a July telephone call to investigat­e Biden’s family and Ukraine’s role of in the 2016 election that put Trump in office. The calls to investigat­e Joe Biden and son Hunter have come without evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden, in either country.

Trump has defended his conduct as “perfect” and said he will refuse to comply with the inquiry.

FLURRY OF SUBPOENAS AND DEPOSITION­S

Despite Trump’s assertions that he won’t cooperate, some members of his administra­tion are participat­ing anyway.

Staff and lawmakers from the House Intelligen­ce Committee, the House Oversight and Reform Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called in several State Department witnesses.

They have already heard from two: Kurt Volker, a former envoy to Ukraine, and Marie Yovanovitc­h , a former ambassador to Ukraine. Fiona Hill, a former White House adviser who focused on Russia, is expected to appear in private on Monday, with plans for Gordon Sondland , the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, to follow on Thursday. Sondland didn’t show up for a scheduled deposition last week after the State Department directed him not to come, but his lawyer said he would comply with a subpoena issued by the committees afterward.

Democrats want to ask Sondland about text messages provided by Volker that show the two of them acting as intermedia­ries as Trump urged Ukraine to start the investigat­ions.

The committees are also seeking closed-door deposition­s with George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state in the European and Eurasian Bureau, and Ulrich Brechbuhl, a State Department counselor.

The panels have subpoenaed or requested documents from the White House, the Defense Department, the White House Office of Management and Budget, Vice President Mike Pence, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and two Giuliani associates. The deadlines for most of those requests are this coming week.

THE WHISTLEBLO­WER

The chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., suggested Sunday that the committee may not need to hear from the whistleblo­wer after weeks of negotiatio­ns to obtain the person’s testimony. The talks have centered on how to protect the whistleblo­wer, who is publicly unknown, and prevent retaliatio­n, given that Trump has said he wants to know the person’s identity. Congressio­nal aides have even suggested somehow disguising the whistleblo­wer so that person’s identity wouldn’t be revealed.

Schiff said “it may not be necessary” to take steps that could risk disclosing the person’s identity to find out more about the July telephone call. The White House released a rough transcript of the call last month.

“Given that we already have the call record, we don’t need the whistleblo­wer, who wasn’t on the call, to tell us what took place during the call,” Schiff said on CBS’ “Face the Nation. “We have the best evidence of that.”

DEMOCRATS STICK TO THEIR STRATEGY

Pelosi has been unflappabl­e while Republican­s have criticized her for declining to hold a vote to authorize the impeachmen­t inquiry. The Constituti­on doesn’t require one, but the House held such votes during the impeachmen­t investigat­ions of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

In a conference call with the Democratic caucus on Friday, the issue didn’t even come up, according to a person familiar with that private call who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss it.

Still, some Democrats have suggested that a vote couldn’t hurt.

“My own opinion is that we ought to just take this off the table because it’s such a nonissue, and there’s no doubt in my mind that of course if Nancy Pelosi does that, she will have the votes and that will pass,” said Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticu­t, a member of the intelligen­ce Committee. “But it’s not required,” he said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

COURT BATTLES

 ?? EVAN VUCCI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the Lake Charles Civic Center, Friday in Lake Charles, La.
EVAN VUCCI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the Lake Charles Civic Center, Friday in Lake Charles, La.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States