The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

‘Bias in action’

-

Press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the Twitter fact checks reflected “bias in action.”

Trump and his campaign reacted after Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted “mail boxes will be robbed.” Under the tweets, was a link reading, “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstant­iated claims.

Trump accused Twitter of interferin­g in the 2020 presidenti­al election” and declared “as president, I will not allow this to happen.” His campaign manager, Brad Parscale, said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertisin­g from Twitter months ago.” In fact, Twitter has banned political advertisin­g since last November.

The president’s critics have scolded the platforms for allowing him to put forth false or misleading informatio­n that could confuse voters.

“Donald Trump’s order is plainly illegal,” said Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat and advocate for internet freedoms. He is “desperatel­y trying to steal for himself the power of the courts and Congress . ... All for the ability to spread unfiltered lies.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said it was “outrageous” that while Twitter had put a fact-check tag on Trump’s tweets asserting massive mail-in election fraud, it had not removed his tweets suggesting without evidence that a TV news host had murdered an aide years ago.

“Their business model is to make money at the expense of the truth and the facts that they know,” she said of social media giants, also mentioning Facebook. She said their goal is to avoid taxes “and they don’t want to be regulated, so they pander to the White House.”

The president and fellow conservati­ves have been claiming, for years, that Silicon Valley tech companies are biased against them. But there is no evidence for this — and while the executives and many employees of Twitter, Facebook and Google may lean liberal, the companies have stressed they have no business interest in favoring on political party over the other.

The trouble began in 2016, two years after Facebook launched a section called “trending,” using human editors to curate popular news stories. Facebook was accused of bias against conservati­ves based on the words of an anonymous former contractor who said the company downplayed conservati­ve issues in that feature and promoted liberal causes.

In August 2018, Trump accused Google of biased searches and warned the company to “be careful.” Google pushed back sharply, saying Trump’s claim simply wasn’t so: “We never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment.”

Experts, meanwhile, suggested that Trump’s comments showed a misunderst­anding of how search engines work.

Last year, Trump again blasted social media companies after Facebook banned a slew of extremist figures including conspiracy peddler Alex Jones from its site and from Instagram. new rules to avoid a repeat of the false postings about the candidates and the voting process that marred the 2016 election.

The coronaviru­s pandemic has further escalated the platforms’ responses, leading them to take actions against politician­s, a move they’ve long resisted, who make misleading claims about the virus.

Last month, Twitter began a “Get the Facts” label to direct social media users to news articles from trusted outlets next to tweets containing misleading or disputed informatio­n about the virus. Company leaders said the new labels could be applied to anyone on Twitter and they were considerin­g using them on other topics.

The Democratic National Committee said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets should have been removed, not just flagged, for violating the company’s rules on posting false voting informatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States