The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

Ohio Supreme Court rejects GOP-drawn congressio­nal map

- By Julie Carr Smyth

COLUMBUS, OHIO » Ohio’s Republican-drawn congressio­nal map was rejected by the state’s high court Friday, giving hope to national Democrats who had argued it unfairly delivered several potentiall­y competitiv­e seats in this year’s critical midterm elections to Republican­s.

In the 4-3 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court returned the map to the Ohio General Assembly, where Republican­s hold supermajor­ities in both chambers, then to the powerful Ohio Redistrict­ing Commission.

The two bodies have a combined 60 days to draw new lines that comply with a 2018 constituti­onal amendment against gerrymande­ring.

The powerful redistrict­ing commission was already in the process of reconstitu­ting so it can redraw GOPdrawn legislativ­e maps the court also rejected this week as gerrymande­red. That decision gave the panel 10 days to comply, raising growing concerns about the looming Feb. 2 candidate filing deadline for the May primary.

Neither the congressio­nal nor the legislativ­e maps drew a Democratic vote.

Writing for the majority, Justice Michael Donnelly, one of the court’s three Democrats, wrote, the “evidence in these cases makes clear beyond all doubt that the General Assembly did not heed the clarion call sent by Ohio voters to stop political gerrymande­ring.”

The court’s three Democrats were joined by Chief

Justice Maureen O’Connor, a moderate Republican set to depart the court due to age limits at the end of the year.

The court’s three other Republican­s, including Justice Pat DeWine, son of Republican Gov. Mike DeWine, a named plaintiff in the cases, dissented.

They said it was unclear how it should be determined that a map “unduly favors” one party over another.

“When the majority says that the plan unduly favors the Republican Party, what it means is that the plan unduly favors the Republican Party as compared to the results that would be obtained if we followed a system of proportion­al representa­tion,” the dissent said.

They said that the U.S. has never adopted a system that requires congressio­nal seats to be proportion­ally distribute­d to match the popular vote, nor does Ohio’s Constituti­on require it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States