The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

US, NATO should plan now for Ukraine aftermath

- David Ignatius Columnist

Many months of brutal fighting lay ahead in Europe and the Pacific when the United States gathered its partners at Bretton Woods, N.H., in July 1944 to plan the global order that would follow World War II. The Allies knew what institutio­ns the world would need — the future Internatio­nal Monetary Fund, World Bank, and United Nations — even before they could see the final victory.

The United States and its NATO partners need to show similar creative imaginatio­n now as the war in Ukraine grinds on. The West’s leaders may not be able to describe just how or when the awful battle will end, but they know the building blocks of the future: security, prosperity, law and order, democracy. And they can begin the reconstruc­tion process now, even while the fighting still rages.

The world will eventually celebrate a final Ukrainian victory and the expulsion of the last Russian invader. But that could be years, even decades, away. We aren’t going to see a peace treaty signed on the battleship Missouri any time soon. For a long while, Ukraine is likely to be a partially divided country, with Russian troops across what’s likely to be a hot cease-fire line.

This stalemate and separation would be cruel. But as Ukrainians plan for the next few years, they should consider the examples of South Korea or West Germany — which became wildly successful democracie­s in the shadow of unfinished wars and despotic adversarie­s.

Strategic patience will be a weapon, along with Ukraine’s fierce defiance. The West should make clear that it will refuse any formal recognitio­n of Russian sovereignt­y in territory it has seized — just as the United States for generation­s refused to recognize Soviet control of the Baltic states. Eventually, it will come right.

For now, the goal for Ukraine and its NATO allies should be to contain the Russian offensive within southeaste­rn Ukraine, push Putin’s forces back where possible, and make this war too painful for Russia to continue indefinite­ly. The latest U.S. intelligen­ce reports suggest this is an achievable goal, but one that carries risks for both Ukraine and its allies.

Avril Haines, the director of national intelligen­ce, provided a clear summary of current U.S. assessment­s during Senate testimony. The Ukraine battle “is developing into a war of attrition,” she explained. Putin still wants to dominate Kyiv, and control all of Ukraine’s Black Sea coast. But he lacks the convention­al military power to achieve these aims. This “mismatch” between his ambitions and capabiliti­es could produce “a more unpredicta­ble and potentiall­y escalatory trajectory,” she said.

The shape of Europe is moving inexorably against Putin because of the folly of his invasion. Finland applied on Thursday to join NATO, and it will likely be followed by Sweden. Britain is offering Finland and Sweden a defense pact on the way to NATO membership, and when I asked British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace Thursday whether that meant a “nuclear umbrella,” he didn’t say no.

Reconstruc­tion should begin now in Ukraine, even as the war continues. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has published an online menu for reconstruc­tion, United24. Western nations should begin pledging to meet those requests.

The eventual bill for this war will be immense. A Ukrainian official told me on Wednesday that the eventual cost will exceed $500 billion, according to estimates prepared by the Kyiv School of Economics. The U.S. Agency for Internatio­nal Developmen­t and other global agencies are already pumping in billions in humanitari­an and other assistance.

This reconstruc­tion process eventually must include Russia, too, paradoxica­l as that may sound. It won’t happen soon. Alexander Gabuev, a senior analyst at the Carnegie Center in Moscow who recently left Russia, told me Thursday that a large majority of Russia supports Putin’s war.

George Robertson, a former NATO secretary general, shared with me comments that Putin made at NATO’s summit with Russia in Rome in 2002. Recalling Russia’s long isolation in the Cold War, Putin observed: “Nothing good came of that confrontat­ion between us and the rest of the world. We certainly gained nothing by it.”

Even as the war continues in Ukraine, I hope President Biden will keep repeating the message: “The Russian people are not our enemy.” The United States must continue to illuminate an eventual path of return. Someday, an exhausted, traumatize­d Russia will come in from the cold.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States