The Ukiah Daily Journal

After gig companies’ Prop. 22 win, labor groups vow challenges

- By Lauren Hepler James Bikales contribute­d reporting.

Now that California­ns have voted to keep ridehailin­g drivers classified as contractor­s with limited job benefits, unions are shoring up their defenses as labor lawyers eye legal challenges and hope that Democrat Joe Biden ekes out a White House victory.

In a major blow to organized labor, 58% of California voters have thus far backed Propositio­n 22, sending ride- hailing giants’ stock prices soaring Wednesday.

Labor groups that spent $20 million against Prop. 22, meanwhile, are warning that the measure cements gig workers as a “second class” of workers and mulling limited options to challenge it.

“It’s too soon to know what the shapes of those challenges will look like,” said Rey Fuentes, a fellow with labor advocacy group the Partnershi­p for Working Families, which opposed Prop. 22. “There’s been such a sweeping change to the law that there are still questions to be answered.”

Fuentes said they could lobby a potential Biden administra­tion’s Department of Labor to issue stronger federal rules for worker classifica­tion. Another option, he said, could be to sue over provisions like preemption of local labor laws, issues related to state worker’s compensati­on requiremen­ts or a 7/8 supermajor­ity to amend the measure. Gig companies could push their own federal legislatio­n, too, after successful­ly spurring President Donald Trump to provide emergency pandemic unemployme­nt benefits to drivers.

Gig companies spent $205 million on the ballot fight, shattering state campaign spending records, and the victory marks a dramatic rebuke of California lawmakers’ move to reclassify many contract workers as employees entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, health care, paid leave and other benefits. Now, with the presidenti­al race still undecided, the state’s war over gig work could also sway the national conversati­on over the future of work.

“Prop. 22 is now the first law in the nation requiring health, disability and earnings benefits for gig workers,” Lyft Chief Policy Officer and former U.S. Secretary of Transporta­tion Anthony Foxx said in a statement. “Lyft stands ready to work with all interested parties, including drivers, labor unions and policymake­rs, to build a stronger safety net for gig workers in the U.S.”

Under Prop. 22, delivery and ride-hailing drivers for companies like Uber, Lyft, Instacart and Doordash — the yes campaign’s primary backers — will be guaranteed 120 percent of minimum wage and health care subsidies, based on the time when a passenger or order is in the car, plus new offerings including accident insurance.

UNIONS HIT A ROADBLOCK

In the months before the election, omnipresen­t Prop. 22 campaign ads focused heavily on driver flexibilit­y and access to fast cash with unemployme­nt surging during the pandemic. But under the surface, the campaign doubled as a proxy war over the future of organized labor.

That tension was clear in a tweet re-posted by Uber CEO Dara Khosrowsha­hi shortly after the Prop. 22 victory was projected by the media, which attacked “bigmoney unions” and San Diego Democrat and AB 5 author Lorena Gonzalez as a “grifter.” Gonzalez also didn’t mince words after the results were tallied: “Don’t come at me with your antiunion dribble,” she wrote on Twitter. “Uber & Lyft didn’t spend $200 (million) talking about unions, they spent it lying about worker protection­s.”

Another controvers­ial provision of Prop. 22 that labor groups said could spur a legal challenge is a preemptive ban on driver collective bargaining, another setback for unions that have

struggled to organize the exploding tech workforce. In an election night statement, anti-prop. 22 driver group Gig Workers rising vowed that, “For California’s gig workers, this is far from over.”

Unions’ 21st- century political influence were also tested in the presidenti­al race, with labor stronghold­s like Ohio and Wisconsin splinterin­g in their support for Trump and Biden.

In the meantime, drivers like Erica Mighetto are reevaluati­ng their future in the state. The Bay Area Uber and Lyft driver is currently homeless and opposed Prop. 22 in hopes of higher pay and benefits as an employee.

“We’re already making less than minimum wage,” Mighetto said. “I know that for myself and my partner who’s also a driver, we have one foot outside California, and we would be very sad to leave.”

THE DRIVER DIVIDE

Hope Alexandra Slason already had her star-span

gled celebratio­n outfit ready when she heard that Prop. 22 won. It was a major milestone on a long road for Slason, 28, who was living in a storage unit near her college in Santa Barbara when she started driving for Uber and Lyft in the fall of 2018.

At an average $20-30 an hour before expenses, she was soon working full-time and “making more than I ever have,” and quit her two other jobs at a café and as a math tutor. She moved into a hotel, then an Airbnb, then her own place. With AB 5, Slason was horrified that income would go away, so she became a vocal supporter of Prop. 22 to keep working when she chooses as she finishes a computer science degree.

“I will definitely go out to the bar and scream and holler,” Slason said, “because this has been the most stressful eight months of my life.”

In Palm Springs, fellow driver Kenneth Martinson felt just as strongly about Prop. 22 — but he vehemently opposed the mea

sure on the grounds that drivers will earn much less after factoring in expenses. “I think they’ll be emboldened to keep lowering our pay,” Martinson said.

Dueling business and labor-backed pay studies before the election found that drivers make anywhere from $5.64 to $27.58 an hour, depending how you calculate wait time and expenses. The nonpartisa­n Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office told voters that most drivers make $11-16 an hour after expenses.

After Prop. 22 passed, Fuentes said that labor groups will continue to push state and city officials to see through previous enforcemen­t actions, such as wage theft claims that workers have filed this year for the months when gig companies did not comply with AB 5. Several other pending state court cases against Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart are likely to wither after the changes under Prop. 22.

Under California law, ballot measures take effect five days after election results are certified, putting Prop. 22 on a path to implementa­tion by mid-december.

As the dust settles in California, drivers in other states are also watching closely. On the outskirts of Washington, D.C., Isabel Rodriguez lives in her car between shifts for Lyft and Doordash. Rodriguez has an IT degree but started working as a driver while applying for permanent U.S. residency, and sees the far-away Golden State as a preview of her own fate.

“If they win and they’re so powerful, no one will be able to stop them,” Rodriguez said. “Especially now with the pandemic, there won’t be much jobs.”

 ?? RINGO CHIU — ZUMA WIRE/ALAMY LIVE NEWS ?? Uber and Lyft vehicles do drop-offs and pickups at Long Beach Airport.
RINGO CHIU — ZUMA WIRE/ALAMY LIVE NEWS Uber and Lyft vehicles do drop-offs and pickups at Long Beach Airport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States