The Ukiah Daily Journal

Termites, capitalist­s, and resilience

- By Crispin B. Hollinshea­d Crispin B. Hollinshea­d lives in Ukiah. This and previous articles can be found at cbhollinsh­ead.blogspot.com.

When termites attack a wood building, they eat the structural resilience designed into the building. Being intimately aware of the tension in the fibers they are eating, they leave before the rupture point. Then, the unexpected load of an earthquake, strong winds, or a party with fifty friends, makes the house fall down. Free market capitalism works the same way.

In manufactur­ing, uncertaint­ies in component production and transporta­tion can cause expensive delays in assembly, which can be avoided by stockpilin­g materials. The greater the stockpile, the greater the resilience in the system, but with greater cost incurred. In the 1970’s, the Japanese perfected what became known as “just in time manufactur­ing.” With exacting timing of component production and reliable inexpensiv­e transporta­tion, parts arrive for assembly “just in time,” reducing stored inventory costs. As long as everything works as designed, this gives a competitiv­e economic advantage, and the process spread around the world. But like termites, all system resilience is squeezed out, making systems extremely vulnerable to the unexpected.

For example, in July, 1993, there was an explosion at a Japanese factory making epoxy resin used to encapsulat­e semiconduc­tor chips. Despite a massive global market for semiconduc­tors, this one factory was the primary source for the resin. Chip prices doubled within days and looming shortages threatened disruption of multiple industries. At great cost, the market place scrambled to establish alternativ­e production lines to produce this essential ingredient.

The illusion of economic thrift from reduced resilience was central to the disaster of America’s Covid-19 response. For decades, capitalist­s have told us that we can’t afford socialized medicine, public health for all, despite every advanced country in the world having figured out how to make it work. Because profit, rather than a healthy population, is the primary driver in our system, there is incentive to reduce public health infrastruc­ture to the bare minimum, accepting that some people are priced out of the market. During normal times, the result is a high level of chronic diseases resulting from unaddresse­d preventati­ve care, leading to more expensive emergency room admissions. During the pandemic, the result was the highest death toll on the planet.

The world hasn’t faced this kind of pandemic for a century, and even nations with good public health infrastruc­ture were hard hit. Our health care industry is regulated to some extent, is a combinatio­n of non-profit and for-profit entities, and is somewhat backstoppe­d by the federal government. Even with dysfunctio­nal federal leadership for the first year, states and hospitals worked together, sharing resources, informatio­n, and staff, and managed to avoid total collapse of health care. But it was a close call in many communitie­s.

To see the full downside effect of no resilience in an unfettered capitalist free market, look no further than the recent collapse of the Texas power grid due to cold weather. This event wasn’t even unexpected, since the same thing happened ten years earlier.

Convinced that government is always a problem and privatized free market capitalism is always the solution, Texas Republican­s created an unregulate­d energy grid in the 1990’s. It was intentiona­lly disconnect­ed from the rest of the country to avoid federal regulation­s, promising that competitio­n would insure Texans got the cheapest power possible. But cheap is different from quality.

In theory, when demand exceeds supply, prices rise, reducing demand or inviting new resources into the lucrative market, bringing prices back down. In practice, the Texas energy market rapidly concentrat­ed into two major providers, which wound up overchargi­ng Texans by $28B over the next 3 decades. With no incentive to invest in reserve capacity, or costly upgrades to improve weather resilience, the entire system was unprepared for infrequent extreme conditions. Last month, unusual cold froze half of the available Texas grid generation, reducing supply to 40 megawatts trying to meet a 70 megawatt demand. People couldn’t reduce demand, and there was no way to import new resources. To avoid complete destructio­n, the grid was shut down, creating a record setting $20B disaster. To add insult to injury, unregulate­d market prices spiked to produce some consumer bills over $10K for the month, thus capitalizi­ng the profits and socializin­g the losses.

Creating system resilience to avoid large social and economic disasters requires long term planning and upfront investment, impossible for corporate capitalism, driven by least cost, short term profit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States