Manfred turns up heat on Oakland
Viewing relocation as bluff ‘is a mistake’
Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred put pressure on the Oakland A’s Howard Terminal stadium project Tuesday saying Oakland City Council votes this month “will determine the fate of baseball in Oakland” and that thinking of relocation to Las Vegas as a bluff is “a mistake.”
Manfred, speaking to the Baseball Writers’ Association of America before Tuesday night’s All-star Game in Denver, said a negative vote on July 20 by the city council for the non-binding agreement for the A’s Howard Terminal development proposal could spell the end of baseball in Oakland.
“John Fisher has done everything I’ve asked him to do in terms of keeping the A’s in Oakland and more than I asked him to do in terms of financial commitment,” Manfred said. “So we’re going to know one way or another what’s going to happen in Oakland in the next couple of months. If you can’t get a ballpark, the relocation process, whether it’s Las Vegas or a broader array of cities that are considered, will take on more pace.”
City leaders said in meetings last week that they want more assurances from the A’s on the matter of affordable housing and community benefits, but Manfred framed next week’s vote in black-and-white terms:
“This is the decision point for Oakland as whether they want to have Major League Baseball going forward,” he said.
Oakland officials have asked that as part of any deal, the A’s sign a non-relocation agreement lasting 45 years, but the A’s so far have been only willing to commit to staying for 20 years as part of the proposed deal. The A’s also want a requirement that 15 percent of the housing built at the ballpark be affordable housing to be waived.
A group that includes owner John Fisher and president Dave Kaval explored possible sites for relocation in the Las Vegas area last month and made another trip last week. The group also has plans to visit Las Vegas on July 21, the day after the city council vote.
“I suspect if they get a yes ... Travel plans are a fluid thing,” Manfred said. “If they don’t get a yes, they need to figure something out.”
Kaval said in May that the A’s quest to build a ballpark and development at Howard Terminal is on a “parallel path” with their search for a viable location in Las Vegas.
On Tuesday, Manfred warned these fact-finding missions are serious and the A’s could soon be told to explore other markets.
“Las Vegas is a viable alternative for a majorleague club, and there are other viable alternatives that I haven’t turned the A’s loose to even explore at this point,” Manfred said. “Thinking about this as a bluff is a mistake.”
The A’s and MLB have said the Coliseum site where the current ballpark sits is not a viable site to build a new one, and Manfred explained the league sees the joint tenancy between the A’s and the city as the biggest complication because the city is hosting other suitors for the other half of the property.
“There’s more than location involved in the viability of the site. Let’s start with the fact that the county and city were joint tenants there,” Manfred said. “Twin tenancies are a very complicated situation. The city’s gone down a different path in terms of entertaining sale of their piece of it to other bidders. It’s just not viable at this point. You’ve got other people looking to develop the site. And most fundamentally, John Fisher is going to invest over a billion dollars. He thinks the place he has the greatest likelihood of success is Howard Terminal.”