The Ukiah Daily Journal

Human-caused earthquake­s in the Midwest

-

Last week, the central time zone was the most seismicall­y active area of the lower 48 states, chalking up 48 earthquake­s of magnitude 2.5 or larger. I can usually bet on California to take the lead, but this week, states in the middle part of the country accounted for the majority, including two M4s in West Texas and one in Kansas.

None of these earthquake­s were damaging, but M4s in Texas and Kansas would have been highly unusual two decades ago. The national network of seismic stations in the United States is dense enough that no magnitude 4 or larger quakes would have been missed going at least as far back as 1980. It’s easy for anyone to do a search (click the latest earthquake­s link at https://earthquake.usgs. gov/ at select Search Catalog from the menu).

In the 30-year window from 1980 to 2010, 58 M≥4 earthquake­s occurred in the central U.S. between the longitude bands correspond­ing to western Wyoming and rastern Oklahoma, a rough average of two per year. Most of these earthquake­s are within the mountain areas of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico. Only three were located in Oklahoma, one in Kansas and eight in West Texas. This is probably a good picture of the natural background activity of the region.

A search of earthquake­s in the 11 years since 2010 shows a different picture. 165 earthquake­s of 4 or larger were located in this same region, an average of 15 per year. Activity in the mountain states is similar; the big increase is in the Midwest. The largest contributo­r is Oklahoma with 94. Prior to 2010, Oklahoma experience­d a magnitude 4 or larger earthquake about once every 10 years. In 2015 alone, thirty M4s were recorded.

Earthquake activity can considerab­ly from year to year. In the three years between 2016 — 2019, only 31 earthquake­s of 4 or larger were located in Eastern California and Nevada. Since 2019, that number climbed to 228. It’s easy to explain what is happening — a series of big earthquake­s and their aftershock­s. The Ridgecrest sequence with its 6.5 and 7.1 on July 4 and 5, 2019 started the activity that continued with the M6.5 Monte Cristo earthquake in Western Nevada in May 2020 and earthquake­s in the Owens Valley and Antelope Valley.

The recent earthquake­s in California and Nevada are classic tectonic earthquake­s — caused by regional stresses driven by the heat within the earth.

Human activity has nothing to do with the occurrence. These earthquake­s occur on faults that may remain quiet for decades or centuries and then reawaken with one or several large earthquake­s followed by years of smaller aftershock­s.

Could a similar reason explain the increase in earthquake activity in the Midwest? Highly unlikely. These aren’t typical tectonic sequences with a larger quake followed by smaller ones that slowly decrease in frequency as time passes. Most of the Midwest earthquake­s are small and clustered in narrow zones. Volcanic areas and geothermal zones like the Salton Sea area of Southern California are notable for swarm activity with numerous nearly equal-sized quakes occurring over days and weeks. These swarms are related to the natural movement of hot fluids and magma, definitely not likely in the Midwest.

But fluids are likely a big part of the Midwest earthquake story. It’s the source of the fluids that make these quakes very different from tectonic, volcanic, or geothermal events. The sudden increase in earthquake activity correspond­s to a regulatory event. In 2008, the U.S. prohibited the disposal of waste fluids from drilling operations into surface reservoirs because of concerns for groundwate­r contaminat­ion and pollution. Oil drilling operations were required to inject waste fluids in deep wells, often more the 10,000 feet below the surface.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency designates Class II wells for the disposal fluids associated with natural gas and oil exploratio­n and estimates 180,000 such wells are currently operating in the United States. EPA estimates over 2 billion gallons of brine and other wastes are injected into these wells every day.

The overwhelmi­ng majority of the Class II wells have absorbed these fluid wastes with no noticeable effects. But the exceptions are interestin­g and pose a potential seismic threat. The problem first became noticeable in Oklahoma with a rapid increase in seismic activity. It was difficult to directly pin the earthquake activity on injection as the location, rates and volumes of fluids are proprietar­y in most states, but a damaging 5.7 in 2011 brought national attention.

By 2015, the extraordin­ary increase in Oklahoma earthquake activity became a concern for insurers (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usaoklahom­a-earthquake­s/ insurers-shun-risk-as-oillinked-quakes-soar-inoklahoma-iduskcn0y3­0dc). Oklahoma State legislator­s enacted legislatio­n in 2015 to control the volume and rate of fluid injection and the number of earthquake­s swiftly declined. Only four Oklahoma earthquake­s have made it into the magnitude 4 range since 2019.

As Oklahoma-induced activity declined, increases are occurring in other areas. The earthquake activity of the last week highlights two new hotspots. The Chihuahua Desert east of El Paso has become one of the shakiest spots in the nation (https:// www.eenews.net/articles/ earthquake­s-linked-todrilling-are-messing-withtexas/), with thirteen M≥4 earthquake­s in 2021. The area is remote, the earthquake­s have caused no damage, and few have felt them. But the concern is the potential for stronger earthquake­s and ironically, it’s the oil and gas industry that has the most to lose if shaking disrupts pipelines and production facilities. This month, state regulators have requested operators to develop plans to reduce earthquake activity.

The second hotspot is Kansas. Both the Dec. 8 M4.3 and Dec. 15 4.0 earthquake­s near the city of Salina, Kansas were felt by hundreds of people over much of the state and by a few as far away as Kansas City, Missouri and Omaha, Nebraska. Kansas legislator­s have yet to pass regulation­s on injection activity (https://www.kcur.org/ economy/2018-02-15/environmen­talists-duel-withdrille­rs-over-kansas-earthquake-legislatio­n). Keep your eyes peeled — a few more or stronger earthquake­s could nudge them in the same direction as Texas.

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? The infographi­c shows the difference between earthquake prevalence in the Midwest during two different time periods.
CONTRIBUTE­D The infographi­c shows the difference between earthquake prevalence in the Midwest during two different time periods.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States