The Ukiah Daily Journal

Leak on draft of abortion decision gives nation much to think about

-

SAN DIEGO >> I'm pro-choice — with guardrails.

I support a woman's right to choose whether to end a pregnancy. As a man, it would be presumptuo­us and inappropri­ate to say otherwise.

Yet I also like the idea of restrictio­ns because, in the United States, abortion should be safe, legal and rare — as the saying goes — but not easy. For instance, I support a ban on late-term abortions, waiting periods, and laws that require parents be notified when teens seek the procedure. The taking of a human life should not be treated lightly.

In response to a leak of a draft majority Supreme Court opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that would strike down Roe v. Wade — the landmark 1973 decision that guaranteed federal constituti­onal protection­s of abortion rights — many Americans don't know what to think.

Here are 10 things I've been thinking about:

-Being pro-choice doesn't mean accepting that Roe v. Wade was rightly decided. It was not. There is no constituti­onal right to abortion in the 4th and 14th Amendment, and the trimester scheme created out of whole cloth by the majority was always a giveaway that the decision was built on sand. Sooner or later, the tide was going to roll in and destroy it.

-A Washington POST/ABC News poll taken before the leak found that 54 percent of Americans think Roe v. Wade should be upheld while just 28 percent believe it should be overturned. Thus the high court — and the GOP — are both out of step with most of America. That suggests that, in the midterm elections, Republican­s are headed for a pummeling.

-It's not because Americans vote based on abortion, but because many of us don't like extremism — on the left or the right — and we'll fight against it. Last year, it was defunding the police, open borders, and cancel culture that Americans frowned upon. This year, it could be the Supreme Court scrapping Roe v. Wade.

-Republican­s should not need this sermon. A party that has spent the last few decades scolding women and people of color about taking responsibi­lity for their actions will soon get the chance to show us how it is done. GOP, it's time to walk it like you talk it. You want to wipe your feet on the view of more than half of America? You're going to pay the piper.

-A Supreme Court precedent that is nearly 50 years old, and has withstood dozens of legal challenges, ought to be — with very few exceptions — respected and left alone. At least three generation­s of Americans have grown up with women having a federal right to an abortion. Upsetting that precedent would be catastroph­ic to society.

— Abortion is not a top issue for African Americans and Latinos, and it never has been. This may have something to do with the fact that Planned Parenthood — an organizati­on started by Margaret Sanger, part of the eugenics movement and aligned with racist beliefs — has done a poor job over the years of doing effective outreach to people of color in ways that aren't condescend­ing.

-Chief Justice John Roberts, who has previously been reluctant to overturn laws or override precedent especially for reasons that are brazenly political (see: Affordable Care Act), is the jurist to watch. We could have a 5-3-1 decision with Roberts writing his own nuanced opinion that, while still pro-life, doesn't go nearly as far as the one written by Alito.

-As the abortion debate moves from the federal arena to the states, one practical effect of the shift will be to make the blue states bluer and the red states redder. Meanwhile, the purple states will become more contentiou­s, and the arguments in

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States