The Week (US)

Free speech: For me, not for thee

-

MIT needed a speaker for its prestigiou­s annual John Carlson Lecture on climate science this fall, said Michael Powell in The New York Times, and University of Chicago geophysici­st Dorian Abbot “seemed a natural choice.” But in addition to studying climate change and creating mathematic­al models to analyze other planets’ atmosphere­s for signs of extraterre­strial life, Abbot has written and spoken about his opposition to affirmativ­e action and diversity initiative­s on college campuses. An advocate of choosing professors and students by merit, he has objected to, in his words, “treating people as members of a group rather than as individual­s.” His invitation to speak about his scientific work caused “a swell of angry resistance,” and MIT decided to disinvite him. Abbot’s affirmativ­eaction stance is “not outside the mainstream,” said Robby Soave in Reason.com. Last year, 56 percent of voters in liberal California cast ballots to oppose race-based preference­s. But in academia, there are now “rigid ideologica­l requiremen­ts” for free speech, and dissenting views are not tolerated.

Princeton hosted Abbot’s lecture last week, an outcome that might make this look like “a big storm in a small teacup,” said Yascha Mounk in TheAtlanti­c.com. Still, the principle behind MIT’s disinvitat­ion is “deeply worrying.” Abbot was scheduled to speak about physical science, not race or affirmativ­e action. If all academics—and profession­als in other fields—can be shunned or silenced for “controvers­ial political speech,” we will no longer live in a free society. It’s already happening, said Lawrence Krauss in The Wall Street Journal. Many universiti­es’ department­s of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” have grown so powerful that job applicants must submit statements detailing what they’ve done to further the cause of racial justice. Berkeley’s life sciences department rejected 76 percent of its 2018–19 applicants because it deemed their commitment to diversity insufficie­nt.

Campus illiberali­sm is a real problem, said Jonathan Zimmerman in NYDailyNew­s.com, but even as the Right denounces “cancel culture” on a daily basis, it welcomes conservati­ves acting as censors. Right-wingers across the country are now banning schools from teaching “critical race theory”— which has come to mean anything about America’s history of racism, including Alice Walker’s fiction. “I’ve got a modest proposal: Conservati­ves will agree to stop censoring K-12 schools, on the condition that liberals stop censoring higher education.” You either believe in free speech or you don’t.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States