The Week (US)

Same-sex marriage: Will Republican­s vote ‘no’?

-

Republican­s are “squirming” over an upcoming Senate vote on same-sex marriage, said Jeremy Stahl in Slate. Last week, House Democrats and 47 Republican­s passed the Respect for Marriage Act, which would codify the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, making marriage equality the law of the land. Democrats say the bill is necessary after the court struck down Roe v. Wade, with conservati­ve Justice Clarence Thomas urging the court to “revisit” same-sex marriage and other cases since the conservati­ve majority has ruled that a right to privacy does not exist in the Constituti­on. That created an opening “for Democrats to actually put Republican­s on the back foot for a change.” Two-thirds of Americans oppose banning gay marriage, but the GOP base is split. That leaves many Republican­s awkwardly struggling to explain their opposition, with Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida calling the bill a “stupid waste of time.”

He’s right, and Republican­s should vote “no,” said National Review in an editorial. Democrats want to cast opponents of same-sex marriage “as a dwindling band of bigots.” But the “facile argument” that marriage laws only affect individual couples has proved “risibly untrue,” as “religious universiti­es, schools, religious orders, and adoption agencies” have endured “all manner of legal threats” to recognize same-sex unions. But while Obergefell was “constituti­onally dubious” and socially disruptive, “the prospect of the decision’s reversal is vanishingl­y small.” Democrats are claiming there’s an emergency “because a grand total of one justice” wants to reassess Obergefell.

“We’ve heard that before,” said Matt Ford in

The New Republic. Conservati­ves spent decades working to undo Roe while assuring liberals it was settled law, scoffing at the concerns of abortion-rights activists as “hysterical and unrealisti­c.” Conservati­ves are essentiall­y arguing that Thomas is “a harmless kook” who can safely be ignored, said Jonathan Chait in New York magazine. But not long ago the same conservati­ves were warning that same-sex marriage would destroy marriage itself and lead to “social collapse.” Since a significan­t chunk of the GOP base—evangelica­ls especially—still view gays and lesbians marrying as a sinful abominatio­n, “few Republican­s wish to renounce their old stance completely.” Was marriage equality a terrible mistake or an important step forward for human rights? Democrats should force Republican­s to take a side.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States