The Weekly Vista

What's wrong with Political Correctnes­s

- ROBERT HONEYCUTT

The presiding principle of political correctnes­s – the notion that one could change his or her words and actions so as to not offend others’ political sensibilit­ies (as in matters of sex or race) – seems like the appropriat­e thing to do. After all, what could be wrong with the desire not to offend people?

In the 1990s, this movement sparked and spread like a wildfire. We introduced our society to terms like “Caucasian-American,” “visually impaired,” and “mentally challenged.” There was an uptick of support for political correctnes­s in all aspects of life, but then we started seeing problems.

With head-spinning quickness, we created more terms and ideas that aligned with being politicall­y correct, sometimes without even being asked to do so. It became socially and even financiall­y detrimenta­l to not conform to the new way of doing things. Noticing this trend, some took advantage, crying foul whenever they felt offended by anything. Over time, those who were hoping to demand a change were swimming in a messy amalgamate with those just hoping to collect a check. Greed and entitlemen­t crept their way into a movement that once had a positive purpose. With its benevolent beginnings now a distant memory for many, political correctnes­s no longer appears to be politicall­y correct.

Before we rush to judgment, however, we must consider a strong point that has been ignored in the discussion. There is a difference between being politicall­y correct and complying with the enforcemen­t of legal equality. The real problem with today’s political correctnes­s is that it has been ascribed to many things that are actually outside its purview. Transgende­red Americans choosing which bathroom they enter, a store owner being sued for refusing service to homosexual patrons, a Muslim being free to erect a mosque without fear of facing discrimina­tion – these examples are not the result of the pressures of political correctnes­s. These are legal issues, hashed out in a court using motions, arguments and appeals. These are ones where the claims of denial of liberty and equality can be adjudicate­d. For politicall­y incorrect statements and ideals like “That woman needs to get back in the kitchen where she belongs,” or the use of certain off-color terms to describe a group or race, there are generally no legal ramificati­ons. Today, those comments are simply considered out of touch, outdated and shameful as judged by society. And what’s politicall­y acceptable will change as society changes.

Over the last few years, the perception of political correctnes­s changed just as rapidly as it did when people originally endorsed it, and by way of the same medium. Political correctnes­s today is mostly associated with weakness and is largely blamed for an unpopular culture here in the United States. People have callously and blatantly misused and overused the word “offensive” so that it has little weight today. The boy who cried “Wolf!” would get more attention than the one who cries “Offense.” Even so, that doesn’t mean that the idea behind political correctnes­s should be tossed out.

Because of the misuse of the term, people have forgotten the good intentions of political correctnes­s. We still need the right type of political correctnes­s, but we must learn how to separate the good kind from the bad kind. Generally speaking, political correctnes­s should work to eliminate the labels we have assigned to segments of our society. The driving force behind being politicall­y correct should be dismantlin­g prejudices by illuminati­ng the fact that we are all human. We are

all certainly different, but the human race experience­s far more difference­s from person to person than can be accounted for by things like race or gender. Also, let us not forget that some words and attitudes are genuinely hurtful. Hurt is relative; the fact that your hurt and my hurt may be different doesn’t discount your feelings. If I care about my fellow man, then that fact is something I should always keep in mind.

In spite of that, though, being politicall­y correct is seen as pervasive in today’s world. You may have heard or read that it is destroying America, but I say it’s only a reflection of the undergirdi­ng fabric of a growing people. It is only logical that change come with that growth.

When people say they are sick of being politicall­y correct, I am hopeful enough not to allow myself to believe that they long for the “good ole days” when they could call people whatever epithet they wanted and not worry about it.

I am also willing to believe that they are capable of knowing the difference between “politicall­y incorrect” and “legally disparagin­g.”

•••

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States