The Weekly Vista

Zoning Board faces cemetery sign conundrum

- KEITH BRYANT kbryant@nwadg.com

The Board of Zoning Adjustment­s voted unanimousl­y to grant conditiona­l approval to a nonconform­ing, off-premise sign for the Bella Vista Cemetery.

The approval was given with the condition that the city staff attorney looks over the design and ensures it does not open the door for litigation for potential copyright infringeme­nt and that the location, sign area and dimensiona­l characteri­stics of the sign remain unchanged — though new facing was permitted in these conditions.

Ron Bond, of the cemetery board, explained that the signs in question would be replacemen­ts for existing signs alongside Forest Hills Blvd. and Lancashire Blvd. that provide direction to the cemetery.

The goal, he said, was to create a more eye-catching sign that would make it easier for people to find the cemetery. Bond said he’s gotten complaints from people who can’t find the cemetery.

Initially, he said, the cemetery board tried to get into the Wayfinding sign system, but this was denied because the cemetery doesn’t fit neatly into any categories available for the program.

“We submitted a permit to simply replace the existing signs. That also was denied,” Bond told the board. “We are now before you to ask for a variance to replace those signs.”

At this point, he said, the board was planning to re-use the old posts and replace the signs with something more visible and attractive.

He did not believe, he said, there would be any real issue if the footprint remained the same.

“We’re just asking that we be allowed to maintain rights that we already have,” he said. “Really, it’s for the betterment of the community.”

Chris Suneson, director of the Community Developmen­t Services Department, said that the permit was denied and the staff believes the waiver should be denied based on city code.

The signs, he said, are nonconform­ing, but when a new applicatio­n is brought in, the signs need to be brought into conformity with the code. Because the code currently does not allow for off-site signs, he said, these signs — which are not located in an area where the cemetery operates — cannot be rebuilt.

Other off-site locations, he said, will still be prohibited, even if on-site signage does little good for the cemetery.

Moreover, he said, the proposed design was similar to the area’s Wayfinding signage. If the city approves this, he said, there could be a perception that the city is sub-licensing that design. Any emulation of the graphics, colors or shapes, he said, could expose the city to liability.

Board member Larry Wilms said that, with the cemetery being a public service, he sees this differentl­y from other potentiall­y nonconform­ing signs.

“We’re not advertisin­g for profit,” he said. “I don’t know that that makes any difference in terms of interpreti­ng your code.”

Board member Angela Goodman said she agreed that the cemetery provided a public good, and it was frustratin­g to see this much difficulty for a nonconform­ing sign when some commercial enterprise­s have nonconform­ing signs as well.

“I’m extremely frustrated sitting here thinking that we’re deliberati­ng about a sign for a cemetery,” she said. “It’s frustratin­g to think we don’t have another way around this.”

Chairman Robert Walker said that, while he was in agreement, it is important to look at this without emotion and focus on interpreti­ng the code.

After discussing and coming up with the conditions, the board voted unanimousl­y to approve the signs.

The board also looked at a variance on rear and side setbacks for a septic field on Cargill Drive. Without an applicant present to explain why the layout could not be made to fit, the variance was tabled until the board’s next meeting, Dec. 19.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States