The Weekly Vista

Pastoral confidenti­ality is more than just trust

- ROBERT A. BOX Robert Box is the former chaplain for the Bella Vista Police Department and is currently the fire department chaplain. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Confidenti­ality is a huge concept today. It used to be an agreement among friends (or perhaps enemies) that whatever was said or done was secret, and sometimes a “handshake” was the bond that establishe­d it. Today, confidenti­ality is much more specific. Handshakes are not considered evidence in a court of law and a person’s word is almost always suspect.

To be sure, there are many different kinds of confidenti­ality today. What is true for one group of people may not be for another. Consider that there are doctors, lawyers, fire people and law enforcemen­t personnel, and even elected officials who may claim confidenti­ality. In addition, there are certain kinds of confidenti­ality mandated by law, such as the HIPPA laws which govern what happens in our medical facilities. There also are strict confidenti­ality guidelines for pastors and chaplains.

While I cannot speak for the confidenti­ality of other groups, I can speak with some degree of authority about the confidenti­ality of pastors and chaplains. Although the guidelines today are often changing the requiremen­ts for who may be a pastor or chaplain, in almost every situation confidenti­ality hinges upon a person’s ordination. Every major religious denominati­on in the United States has specific regulation­s regarding who may or may not be ordained. Most of these include a certain amount of education and experience, and the examinatio­n of the candidate by a select committee to determine if ordination is warranted. Since ordination may be by either a church or denominati­on, some organizati­ons have elected to bypass many of these regulation­s today, something which is causing some confusion in the area of confidenti­ality.

Endorsed chaplains — those who are endorsed by either a particular denominati­on or profession­al organizati­on — must also adhere to strict guidelines. While including certain education and ordination, endorsed chaplains must also complete a prescribed program of training designed specifical­ly for them — four units of clinical pastoral education. These are usually taught in a hospital setting (but not always), and two of our major hospitals in this area offer this training. Upon completing their training, chaplains then must submit to a very detailed examinatio­n by other competent chaplains or profession­als before they may be listed as being endorsed. The American Pastoral and Chaplain Organizati­on in the United States sets the standard to which most commission­ing organizati­ons adhere.

Having said that, it is important to note that almost anyone may be either a pastor or a chaplain if someone says so. Thus, many pastors have not received their formal training or any recognized ordination. The same holds true for chaplains, many who serve in that capacity just because some group needs them. However, please recognize that the requiremen­ts for pastors and chaplains do not say anything about their effectiven­ess in their positions.

As stated before, confidenti­ality for pastors and chaplains normally resides with their ordination. The same holds true for military chaplains, although they have other guidelines set by law. Simply speaking, a pastor or chaplain may claim confidenti­ality when the conversati­on is between himself and one other person in a confined room (space) with no recordings or notes being taken and never over the telephone. Strictly speaking, this is called “legal” confidenti­ality. Except in rare instances, the legal system in our country will not recognize confidenti­ality when it involves groups or involves someone who is not properly ordained. Unfortunat­ely, there have been numerous pastors and chaplains who have spent time in jail thinking they had confidenti­ality privileges when in fact they did not, and a judge held them in contempt of court.

Of course, there is another kind of confidenti­ality that exists between individual­s and even groups. For instance, if a law enforcemen­t chaplain does not keep confidence­s between himself and officers, deputies, and the command staff, you may be sure he or she will be rejected by everyone involved. I’m sure that the same holds true for confidenti­ality in every other setting. If we do not trust someone to keep our confidence­s, we treat them superficia­lly and do not share our personal informatio­n with them.

It also should be noted that certain types of informatio­n cannot be treated confidenti­ally. For instance, if a law enforcemen­t chaplain is sworn into his or her office, breaking the law may not be confidenti­al. Also, if someone shares an intention to hurt himself or someone else, that must be shared with the proper authority. Chaplains and pastors also are mandatory reporters, which means they must report any sexual crimes or threats to children. Thus, everything on earth is not confidenti­al; the only true confidenti­ality resides in God through Jesus Christ.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States