Tribes seek equality in Colorado plans
Current guidelines on river to expire in 2026
PHOENIX – Two-thirds of the tribes with lands and water rights in the Colorado River Basin are calling for equal status in developing new river management guidelines and protection of their senior water rights against proposed cuts or caps on developing their water.
Leaders from 20 tribes, including eight in Arizona, sent a letter to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on March 11. In the letter, obtained by The Arizona Republic, the tribes outlined what they expect in new river management guidelines that will take effect when the current guidelines expire Dec. 31, 2026.
The two tribes with Arizona’s largest river allocations – the Colorado River Indian Tribes, which holds senior rights to 720,000 acre-feet of water, mostly in Arizona, and the Gila River Indian Community, with 653,000 acre-feet of Colorado River and other waters – did not sign the letter.
The Gila River Indian Community opposed a plan offered by the three Lower Basin states and said it would issue an alternative plan, which it has not yet released. The tribe said it could walk away from a plan if it is not satisfied. The letter from the other tribes did not include a similar ultimatum.
“Basin tribes have long faced systemic barriers to developing and benefiting from their water rights,” the group said. Tribes have until recently been largely left out of Colorado River management planning, even though they hold senior rights to at least 20% of the river. In Arizona, that number is closer to 40%.
The Colorado River Compact, enacted in 1922, barely mentioned tribes’ rights to water. The 2007 guidelines left tribes out almost entirely, the group said.
Tribes stepped forward with voluntary reductions to ease the strain on the river and participated in talks to develop the Drought Contingency Plan, which addressed a historic drought that disrupted the 2007 guidelines that were designed for a 20-year span.
Since then, they have advocated for a greater, more equal role in creating the new management protocols.
There has been some movement toward more tribal participation. Tribes are represented in the Arizona Governor’s Water Policy Council, and Quechan President Jordan D. Joaquin is the first-ever Native member of the the Colorado River Board of California.
The tribal leaders presented three key principles they expect the administration to abide by when developing river management protocols. They said the U.S. must:
● Uphold its trust responsibility to the basin tribes by protecting Indian tribal water rights whether or not they have been quantified.
● Create and support an array of tools to give tribes flexibility in how and when they use their water rights.
● Provide a permanent, formalized structure for tribal participation in implementing the new Colorado River management guidelines during the current negotiations and in any future river policy and governance.
Among other points, the tribes said Reclamation must reject any plan that would force the five Colorado River Valley tribes, four of which have lands and water rights in Arizona, to accept involuntary or uncompensated reductions. Those tribes’ rights were affirmed in the case Arizona v. California and are among the tribes with the oldest affirmed rights, dating back to the mid-19th century.
Leaders said those tribes, as well as tribes who receive their allocations through the Central Arizona Project Canal, should receive alternative water supplies if their water rights usage is disrupted by the new guidelines.
Tribes should also have the right to lease or use water off their reservations, the group said.
During a water conference at the University of Arizona on March 13, Gila River Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis said his 20,000-member tribe had demonstrated its commitment through the years, saving 910,000 acre-feet to date, and has committed to more. This has been done in bipartisan fashion, he said, and the tribe has a strong relationship with Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
“We will need our allies to stand with us in the difficult months and years ahead,” he said.
The Arizona Department of Water Resources declined to comment on the tribes’ letter.
Lewis, who serves on the Governor’s
Water Policy Council with three other tribes and the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, said he applauds the Lower Basin states for seeking consensus, but that consensus must fit with Gila River’s principles, developed during the Drought Contingency Plan talks.
Reiterating the demands in the 20 tribes’ letter, he said the burden of cuts must be fair and equitable across the states and user groups, and that any cuts to tribal water must be accompanied by a fair replacement, either of monetary compensation or replacement water from another source.
If that doesn’t happen, he said, “the community will stand firm and oppose it.”
Gila River has identified an alternative source of water and is talking to the Bureau of Reclamation about it, he said. The community remains committed to finding consensus and will offer a plan that fairly imposes sacrifice on all without violating their principles.
Acting Deputy Secretary of Interior Laura Daniel-Davis acknowledged during a press call earlier in March that tribes in the basin have long-standing rights to water that the administration must honor and uphold. She said Interior initiated the first-ever federal-statetribal partnership to ensure that tribes have a seat at the table at the beginning of developing the new river management guidelines.
Reclamation will begin work on the draft environmental impact statement for the new guidelines this month.
“We’re at the beginning, not the end, of the alternative development phase and will continue to work with all parties throughout the spring and summer to achieve as much consensus as possible,” Daniel-Davis said.
She said the public process can be slow-moving but will include all parties including the best available science and Indigenous knowledge.
“This is especially true in our work with tribal governments and communities who are indispensable partners in our work to address the climate crisis,” she said. “We’re undertaking this process because failure is not an option.”
Contributing: Brandon Loomis, Arizona Republic