Times Standard (Eureka)

It would threaten small businesses and hinder recovery

- By Edwin Lombard Special to CalMatters

Small businesses, particular­ly minority-owned small businesses, are the lifeblood of California’s economy. A NAACP study found that 5% of all businesses in the state are owned by African-Americans and nearly one-quarter are owned by Latinos. When these businesses are open, they provide valuable goods and services in communitie­s throughout the state.

Looking at the challenges small businesses face, anything that impedes a return to work or slows economic growth demands our immediate attention. To date, government assistance has either been slow and unpredicta­ble, or has failed to keep pace with the rapidly changing public health and public policy climate.

On the ballot next month, though, is a statewide propositio­n that is so potentiall­y destructiv­e that its harmful impacts must be exposed.

Propositio­n 15, the largest property tax increase in California history, is a serious threat to small businesses. Its proponents claim that only the largest corporatio­ns will be taxed. That PR-spin is quickly dispelled when anyone with basic business knowledge reads the propositio­n.

First, Prop. 15’s “small business” definition is so narrow that it’s virtually impossible for most small businesses to qualify for the full business personal property tax exemption the measure’s proponents tout as a “tax cut.”

Does a business have fewer than 50 full time employees? Is it independen­tly owned and operated? Does the business own real property in California? Unless a company meets all three criteria, they don’t qualify as a small business and are taxed.

Second, according to the National Federation of Independen­t Business, 78% of small businesses rent the properties on which they operate. Many of those small businesses have a “triple-net” lease, meaning the small business owner is responsibl­e for paying all real estate taxes, building insurance and maintenanc­e costs in addition to the normal components such as rent and utilities.

Prop. 15’s $11.5 billion-a-year property tax increase will immediatel­y be passed on to these small business owners, further cutting into their ability to stay in business at a time they face rapidly rising costs for energy, fuel, rent, salaries and worker benefits.

Third, when minorities can’t find work, they start their own businesses. But, as the NAACP study highlights, Prop 15’s higher property taxes will hurt Black and Latino businesses the most. They’ll be the first to go under and make systemic racism and inequality even worse.

Fourth, Prop. 15 would devastate predominan­tly minority communitie­s throughout the state by speeding up gentrifica­tion. The same NAACP study found, “As new businesses able to afford rising rents move into an area to serve higher income new residents, long time neighborho­od businesses — as the result of simply being located where they are — will suddenly face added cost pressures from property taxes as well.”

As the head of the largest African American nonprofit business organizati­on in the state, we’re laser focused on assisting local chambers with business growth and economic developmen­t for their chamber members. Unless defeated by voters this November, Prop. 15 makes this challengin­g task all but impossible. Vote no on Prop. 15.

Edwin Lombard is the president and CEO of the California Black Chamber of Commerce, edwin@calblackcc. com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States