Times Standard (Eureka)

It’s time to build more trust in our electoral process; here’s how

- By Mindy Romero Special to CalMatters Mindy Romero is a political sociologis­t and director of the Center for Inclusive Democracy at the Price School of Public Policy at the University of Southern California, msromero@usc.edu.

For almost a decade, much has been done in California around election reforms, with measures put in place to help make the election process more accessible and to boost participat­ion among historical­ly underrepre­sented groups and communitie­s of color.

From automatic voter registrati­on to same-day voter registrati­on to increasing access to vote-bymail, our state has taken some significan­t steps that give hope for a more inclusive and representa­tive electorate.

But newly released 2020 general election voter turnout numbers from the Center for Inclusive Democracy at USC show that these efforts — while critically important — are still not enough.

First the good news. Mirroring much of the country, California saw the highest turnout rate of eligible voters in 2020 for any general election in decades. Overall eligible voter turnout was 67.4%. Voter turnout across all population­s in the state improved with more Latinos and Asian Americans casting ballots than in any previous California statewide election.

These numbers are a positive step in the right direction. But unfortunat­ely, they don’t tell the complete story. While historical­ly underrepre­sented groups went to the polls in unpreceden­ted numbers in 2020, so did everybody else.

Time for the bad news. Voter turnout for Latinos increased to 53% in 2020 compared with 46.4% in 2016. Similarly for Asian Americans, turnout in 2020 increased to 47.7% compared to 38.5% four years prior. However, the gap between the eligible voter turnout rates for Latinos and the total population increased to 14.4 percentage points in 2020, up from a 10.9 percentage point gap in 2016. For Asian Americans, that gap was 19.7 percentage points in 2020, compared to an 18.8 percentage point gap in 2016. We do not yet have comparable data available for Black voters or other voters of color.

In short, despite all of our reforms, California is not making progress on closing the participat­ion disparitie­s that leave voters of color behind. These patterns also held true for youth voters in 2020. Turnout gaps by race and age remain entrenched in our electoral system.

What do these turnout gaps tell us about election reforms that California has implemente­d during the past decade?

While these actions were needed to provide greater access for many voters, they aren’t enough, even in an election where people went to the polls in unpreceden­ted numbers. The hard truth is that these reforms were only incrementa­l steps — they were aimed at increasing access to the ballot when creating a truly more representa­tive electorate requires working more holistical­ly to build a government that all voters see as worthy of their time, attention and investment.

To ever come close to eliminatin­g the turnout gaps in California, we need to do more to address the disconnect­ion people feel, especially those from historical­ly underrepre­sented groups, about elections and the act of voting overall.

Reforms over the past decade have largely focused on making it easier for people to vote — still critically important to reduce the barriers for participat­ion. But we also need to do more to help people want to vote.

We need to recognize that many don’t see how the act of voting impacts their lives. Some are outright distrustfu­l that elected officials don’t really serve the interest of their constituen­ts, and many believe that politics is rigged in favor of those with power, access and wealth. This is especially true for voters of color who have been historical­ly marginaliz­ed and often experience a lack of representa­tion by their elected officials. Then consider the politicall­y polarized times in which we live and it should not be surprising why many people don’t vote.

Even regular voters will often quietly confess they vote out of a sense of civic duty or social responsibi­lity but they personally don’t have much faith that their vote will make a difference.

The bottom line is that, at a minimum, the structure of our electoral system discourage­s many people — especially people of color — from participat­ion in the political process, while efforts to overtly suppress the vote of many groups continue across the nation.

Fundamenta­l changes to our political system would help build Americans’ trust in politics and our democratic institutio­ns. For starters, to move the needle on the turnout gap, we need:

• To reduce the political influence of big money;

• To increase equitable public outreach by local and state officials;

• To require transparen­cy of elected officials;

• To draw fair election districts in all levels of government, so community backed candidates have a chance of winning;

• To support a media infrastruc­ture, including local and ethnic media, that can hold elected officials accountabl­e and better inform the public; and

• To effectivel­y address the spread of misinforma­tion and keep it from underminin­g democracy.

• In the aftermath of one of the most polarizing elections that the state and country have ever experience­d, it’s time to examine where we’ve been and where we go next.

A democracy is not strong if the people do not truly believe in it. It is not strong if those living in the democracy don’t believe the decisions of elected officials represent the interests of their constituen­ts.

It’s time to build trust in our electoral process that is earned and engender a deeper connection to why voting matters. It’s time to take leaps not steps if we really hope to have an equitable and accessible election system that serves all California­ns.

 ?? ADAM ZYGLIS — THE BUFFALO NEWS, NEW YORK ??
ADAM ZYGLIS — THE BUFFALO NEWS, NEW YORK

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States