Times Standard (Eureka)

Could Facebook sue whistleblo­wer Frances Haugen?

- By Tali Arbel AP Technology Writer

Facebook has recently taken a harsher tone toward whistleblo­wer Frances Haugen, suggesting that the social network could be considerin­g legal retaliatio­n after Haugen went public with internal research that she copied before leaving her job earlier this year.

U.S. law protects whistleblo­wers who disclose informatio­n about potential misconduct to the government. But that protection doesn’t necessaril­y cover taking corporate secrets to the media.

Facebook still has to walk a fine line. The company has to weigh whether suing Haugen, which could dissuade other employees who might otherwise speak out, is worth casting itself as a legal Godzilla willing to stomp on a woman who says she’s just doing the right thing.

Haugen may face other consequenc­es. Whistleblo­wers

often put themselves at risk of profession­al damage — other firms may be reluctant to hire them in the future — and personal attacks from being in the public eye.

Facebook did not respond to emailed questions.

What did Haugen do?

Haugen secretly copied a trove of internal Facebook documents before leaving the company and subsequent­ly had her lawyers file complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that Facebook hides what it knows about the negative effects of its platform.

John Tye, her lawyer, said the team gave redacted documents to Congress, where Haugen testified on Tuesday, and also informed officials in California. Haugen also shared documents with the Wall Street Journal, which she started talking to in December, leading to a series of explosive stories that began in mid-September.

What was Facebook’s response?

The company says it has been mischaract­erized. “I think most of us just don’t recognize the false picture of the company that is being painted,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote to employees on Tuesday.

Some company officials have also begun using harsher language to describe Haugen’s actions that could be interprete­d as threatenin­g.

In an Associated Press interview Thursday, Facebook executive Monika Bickert repeatedly referred to the documents Haugen copied as “stolen,” a word she has also used in other media interviews. David Colapinto, a lawyer for Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto who specialize­s in whistleblo­wer cases, said that language was threatenin­g.

In the same interview, asked if Facebook would sue or retaliate against the whistleblo­wer, Bickert said only, “I can’t answer that.”

A week earlier, Antigone Davis, Facebook’s head of global safety, testified in the Senate that Facebook “would never retaliate against someone for speaking to Congress,” which left open the possibilit­y that the company might go after her for giving documents to the Journal.

Is Haugen protected?

Various laws offer whistleblo­wer protection at both the state and federal levels. The federal laws applicable to Haugen are the Dodd-Frank Act, a 2010 Wall Street reform law, and the Sarbanes Oxley Act, a 2002 law that followed the collapse of Enron and other accounting scandals.

Dodd-Frank expanded protection­s for whistleblo­wers and empowered the SEC to take action against a company that threatens a whistleblo­wer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States