USA TODAY International Edition
Without Democratic support, GOP can’t lose many votes
from discriminating against those with pre- existing conditions. The GOP bill would weaken that by allowing insurance companies to charge people with pre- existing conditions — anything from cancer to pregnancy — higher premiums than other consumers.
That change prompted Upton’s push to add the $ 8 billion to help sicker patients pay their premiums and other health care bills. Upton and Long sit on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has played a central role in drafting the GOP bill, called the American Health Care Act.
Democrats are unified against the measure, so GOP leaders can lose only 22 Republicans and still pass the bill.
The proposal has been a tug- ofwar between the moderate and conservative factions inside the House Republican Conference during weeks of intense negotiations and embarrassing setbacks.
About 20 lawmakers said they’d vote “no” as of Wednesday afternoon, and about two dozen others remained undecided. After the amendment, Republicans expressed confidence that they could win passage of the bill, a message echoed by hard- line conservatives who helped tank an earlier version of the GOP measure.
“We see that as being a net plus in terms of the vote count,” said Rep. Mark Meadows, R- N. C., head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus.
‘ EXTREMELY CLOSE’
In a series of radio interviews Wednesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R- Wis., said Republicans were “extremely close” to having the votes they need in the House. He touted the latest changes to the bill, asserting that with added funding for high- risk pools, “we’re making sure that we have three or four layers of protections for people with pre- existing conditions.”
Ryan said that by promoting high- risk pools and directly subsidizing people with catastrophic illnesses, “you dramatically lower the price of premiums for everyone else buying health insurance.”
Critics said the Upton provision was woefully inadequate to protect those with pre- existing conditions, and they noted that the Congressional Budget Office estimated an earlier version of the legislation would cause 24 million people to either forgo or lose their health insurance.
“Despite today’s wheeling and dealing, the GOP repeal bill still drops the coverage guarantee for people with pre- existing conditions, strips coverage from millions and drives up costs for millions more,” said Frederick Isasi, executive director of Families USA, a lib- eral- leaning health advocacy group. “A measly $ 8 billion handout isn’t going to change that.”
The American Medical Association, a powerful advocacy group representing physicians, slammed the GOP bill after the revisions. “High- risk pools are not a new idea,” AMA President Andrew Gurman said in a statement Wednesday. “The history of highrisk pools demonstrates that Americans with pre- existing conditions will be stuck in secondclass health care coverage — if they are able to obtain coverage at all.” STILL UNCONVINCED
Some Republicans reaffirmed their opposition to the bill and blasted the latest changes as Washington at its worst.
“The AHCA is like a kidney stone — the House doesn’t care what happens to it, as long as they can pass it,” Rep. Thomas Massie, R- Ky., said in a tweet on Wednesday.
The GOP bill would repeal major elements of the 2010 Affordable Care Act and allow states to opt out of other provisions, including several popular consumer protections.
For example, states could seek a waiver from requirements that insurers must cover maternity care, substance abuse and other key health services.
States can seek an exemption of the pre- existing condition protections, allowing insurers to charge such patients more if the state has created a high- risk pool. Such risksharing programs are intended to help lower patient costs, but they have had mixed results.
If the House does not pass the bill this week, some lawmakers warned Republicans might lose momentum and be forced to look at other options for unraveling Obamacare.
“There’s only so long that you can work a certain principal to try to get to 218 votes, and I don’t know that that improves with time,” Meadows said. “If we don’t have a vote this week on it, we’ll have to do a different strategy.”