USA TODAY International Edition

Amnesty excuses past violations

- Dan Stein Dan Stein is president of the Federation for American Immigratio­n Reform.

Candidate Donald Trump opined that DACA was an unconstitu­tional abuse of executive authority by President Obama and that, if elected, he’d repeal it. Trump was elected (in large measure because of his immigratio­n views) and, if news accounts are correct, will soon make good on that pledge.

Amnesty — comprehens­ive, or piecemeal for specific subgroups of illegal aliens — is not immigratio­n reform. It simply excuses past violations of our immigratio­n laws and encourages the next wave of illegal immigrants, which is why the American public rejected the DREAM Act and the broader Gang of Eight amnesty plan.

The terminatio­n of DACA will pressure congressio­nal Democrats to bargain in good faith on immigratio­n reform that protects the interests of the American people. If they are truly committed to finding a solution for those brought to the country as minors, they will first need to keep countless unkept promises to deter, prevent and enforce laws against future illegal immigratio­n.

Democratic leaders have demonstrat­ed bad faith when it comes to immigratio­n enforcemen­t and protecting the interests of the American people. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer voted in favor of a border fence in 2006, but now vows to block funding for its constructi­on. Just a week ago, Schumer, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and others rejected permanent status for DACA recipients in exchange for a package of enforcemen­t measures.

The American people have been waiting decades for true immigratio­n reform and enforcemen­t. In the interim, many have lost jobs and seen their wages eroded, their children’s schools overwhelme­d and their tax dollars redirected. Remedying those situations must be a prerequisi­te to addressing the status of DACA beneficiar­ies.

No promises were made to the people who have enjoyed temporary protection under DACA, therefore none will be broken if the Trump administra­tion decided to end it. Obama was clear that it could be terminated by subsequent presidents. Promises made to the American people need to be honored with real action, not just more promises.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States