USA TODAY International Edition

House intel Republican­s end Russia probe, find no collusion

But panel does find cyber attacks

- Erin Kelly

WASHINGTON – Republican­s on the House Intelligen­ce Committee called an end on Monday to their year-long investigat­ion of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, concluding that there was “no evidence of collusion, coordinati­on, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

The probe was ended over the objections of Democrats, who charged that key documents and testimony still have not been obtained.

Republican­s said they agreed with the U.S. intelligen­ce community’s January report that Russia tried to interfere in the U.S. presidenti­al election, but did not agree that the Russians were trying to help Donald Trump defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The GOP majority on the House panel will show its draft report to Democrats on Tuesday before seeking approval from the full committee to release it. Democrats plan to write a separate report that likely will conclude there is strong evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

The investigat­ion’s abrupt end underscore­s the bitter partisan divide that has plagued the committee’s work. And it increases pressure on the collegial Senate Intelligen­ce Committee to come out with a credible bipartisan report from its own Russia probe.

“The House Majority has announced it is terminatin­g the Russia investigat­ion, leaving to others the important work of determinin­g the full extent of Russian interferen­ce in our election, the role of U.S. persons connected to the Trump campaign in that interventi­on, possible efforts to obstruct the investigat­ion by the President and most important, what needs to be done to protect the country going forward,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the senior Democrat on the House panel, said in a statement Monday night.

Ending the investigat­ion at this time is “another tragic milestone for this Congress, and represents yet another capitulati­on to the executive branch,” Schiff said.

Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, who led the investigat­ion for the House Republican­s, said the panel conducted 73 witness interviews, held nine hearings and briefings, and reviewed more than 300,000 documents.

“We are confident that we have thoroughly investigat­ed the agreed-upon parameters, and developed reliable initial findings and recommenda­tions.”

Democrats, meanwhile, have been warning that Republican­s were going to end the investigat­ion prematurel­y, without calling dozens of important witnesses to testify and without forcing many of those who testified to answer crucial questions.

“At the outset of the Russia probe, both parties committed to a thorough investigat­ion that would follow the facts wherever they lead,” Schiff has said.

Instead, he said, Republican­s declined to subpoena witnesses to compel them to answer key questions after witnesses refused to do so in voluntary, closed-door appearance­s before the committee. Among the witnesses who refused to answer crucial questions: Donald Trump Jr., Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Trump Organizati­on attorney Michael Cohen, former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowsk­i, and former White House communicat­ions director Hope Hicks.

When former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon refused to answer questions even after being subpoenaed, Republican­s would not take action to hold him in contempt of Congress, Democrats said.

Schiff said Republican­s have refused Democrats’ requests to subpoena documents that could verify or refute witness testimony.

The committee’s bipartisan­ship began unraveling in the spring of last year, when Chairman Devin Nunes, RCalif., took a secret trip to White House grounds to review informatio­n gathered by unnamed sources purporting to show that President Trump was under surveillan­ce by the Obama administra­tion during the 2016 campaign.

At a news conference after his trip, Nunes told reporters that he had discovered evidence to support the president’s claim that he was wiretapped at Trump Tower. Yet the Justice Department confirmed in September that there was no evidence that Trump Tower was targeted for surveillan­ce.

Nunes temporaril­y stepped aside from the Russia investigat­ion last April when the House Ethics Committee announced it was investigat­ing whether Nunes violated any laws or rules by disclosing classified informatio­n. The Ethics Committee closed its investigat­ion in December.

The committee’s partisan split grew deeper in February, when Republican­s released the “Nunes memo” alleging that the FBI and Justice Department abused their surveillan­ce authority to target Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in 2016.

Democrats denounced the Nunes memo as an attempt by Trump and House Republican­s to discredit special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. They released a rebuttal memo a few weeks later.

In addition to investigat­ions by the House and Senate intelligen­ce committees, the Senate Judiciary Committee has conducted a limited probe and is not expected to issue a final report.

 ?? NGAN, AFP/GETTY IMAGES ?? Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., left, and Devin Nunes, R-Calif., talk during a committee hearing in March. MANDEL
NGAN, AFP/GETTY IMAGES Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., left, and Devin Nunes, R-Calif., talk during a committee hearing in March. MANDEL

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States